ShapeWords MCP server
io.github.kirrrr-2423/shapewords-mcp·v0.2.2Generate ShapeWords word clouds as SVG, PNG, or JSON from text or weighted words.
0 stars
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed ShapeWords MCP yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
ShapeWords MCP tools (3, 2 write)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postsRead from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.
create_word_cloud_jobwrite actionStart a ShapeWords render job and return status/artifact URLs without waiting for completion.
get_word_cloud_jobCheck a ShapeWords render job status by ID.
render_word_cloudwrite actionCreate a ShapeWords word cloud, wait for completion, and return the artifact URL plus optional image content.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- Code scan7 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 114 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
How ShapeWords MCP compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 72/100
- higher than 38% of 48,255 servers
- Tools
- 3
- the typical server has 7
- Tools that change things
- 67%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
What its tools let an agent do: 1 read · 1 create · 1 change
Install ShapeWords MCP in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
Runs npx -y shapewords-mcp on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.
claude mcp add shapewords-mcp -- npx -y shapewords-mcp
What the publisher says
From the ShapeWords MCP repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
ShapeWords MCP
Universal MCP server for generating word clouds with ShapeWords.
It exposes ShapeWords rendering tools through the Model Context Protocol, so any MCP-capable client can create SVG, JSON, or PNG word clouds from text, workshop notes, prompts, research snippets, or agent output. By default it uses the hosted ShapeWords Render API; with engine: "skia" it renders locally inside the MCP server with the shared layout core and CanvasKit/Skia.
Tools
All tools use stdio MCP transport.
renderwordcloud
Creates a ShapeWords render job, polls until it is finished, and returns:
- public artifact URL for hosted renders, or a local inline artifact for engine: "skia";
- job metadata;
- optional image content for MCP clients that support image results.
Use this tool for one-shot generation when the caller wants the final artifact.
createwordcloud_job
Starts a render job and returns the job/status/artifact URLs without waiting.
Use this tool for asynchronous workflows where the client will poll later.
getwordcloud_job
Checks a render job by ID.
Use this tool with the jobId returned by createwordcloudjob or renderword_cloud.
Input Schema
renderwordcloud accepts all render options below. createwordcloudjob accepts the hosted options only: engine: "skia" is local-only and is supported by renderword_cloud.
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
ShapeWords MCP: common questions
- Is ShapeWords MCP server safe?
- Mostly: it is graded B (72/100). Read the ShapeWords MCP safety report
- How do I install ShapeWords MCP?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does ShapeWords MCP need an API key?
- Yes. The registry entry asks for
SHAPEWORDS_RENDER_API_KEY. - Is ShapeWords MCP maintained?
- The last commit was 152 days ago (2026-06-05). The latest release is v0.2.2.
- How does ShapeWords MCP compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 72/100 (higher than 38% of 48,255 servers); tools 3 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 67% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.