MCP.Market

The Cost of Work Index MCP server

by kindrat86·io.github.kindrat86/cost-of-work·v2026.3.0

Cost of 13 back-office tasks per unit: person vs software, US, Greece, Ukraine. Sources cited.

C65/100grade C
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
C65/100

full report

Adoption
New

48 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed The Cost of Work Index yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

The Cost of Work Index tools (5)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • estimate_annual_cost

    Turn a monthly volume of a task into monthly and annual cost, for a person and for the AI employee, in one market. Use this when someone asks what a workload costs them per year, or what they would save.

  • get_cost_of_work_index

    The complete Cost of Work Index as JSON — every task, every market, every source, plus the caveats. Use this when you need the dataset itself rather than one answer; prefer `get_task_cost` for a single figure.

  • get_task_cost

    What one unit of a given task costs in a given market — the human cost per unit, the AI cost per unit, and the ratio between them, with the source behind every figure. Markets: `us` (United States), `gr` (Greece), `ua` (Ukraine). Note that `uk` means Ukraine in this dataset, not the United Kingdom.

  • list_sources

    The official statistics behind the human-cost side of the Index — publisher, exact release title, resolvable URL, reference period, and how the published figure became the number used here. Call this when you need to cite or verify a figure.

  • list_work_tasks

    List every task in the Cost of Work Index — the task id, what one unit is, and which AI employee performs it. Call this first when you do not already know the task id you need.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-03 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan3 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancerepository not readable: repo not found3/15
  • Maintainer identityno repository or website to verify2/10
Overall 65/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How The Cost of Work Index compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
65/100
higher than 20% of 48,255 servers
Tools
5
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Downloads a week
48
more than 40% of 12,191 servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 5 read

Install The Cost of Work Index in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

Runs npx -y nika-cost-of-work-mcp on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.

claude mcp add cost-of-work -- npx -y nika-cost-of-work-mcp
Add to Cursor

The Cost of Work Index: common questions

Is The Cost of Work Index MCP server safe?
With care: it is graded C, so read the findings first (65/100). Read the The Cost of Work Index safety report
How do I install The Cost of Work Index?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does The Cost of Work Index need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is The Cost of Work Index maintained?
The latest release is v2026.3.0.
How does The Cost of Work Index compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 65/100 (higher than 20% of 48,255 servers); tools 5 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

More from kindrat86 →