MCP.Market

Solana Token Intelligence MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by k0diak·io.github.k0diak/token-intel·v2.0.0
No reviews yet

Solana token due-diligence: 3-source fused risk verdict incl. LP-lock depth. $0.01 via x402.

A91/100grade A
Write a reviewRun it
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A91/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

0 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Solana Token Intelligence yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Solana Token Intelligence tools (2)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts
  • token_intelFree

    Fused safety + market read on any Solana token: mint/freeze authorities, holder concentration, dev holdings, organic score, liquidity cross-checked across three independent sources (Jupiter, DexScreener, RugCheck incl. LP-lock depth), synthesized 0-100 risk verdict. PAID: $0.01 USDC on Base or Solana (x402 v2, keyless). To pay: fetch requirements by calling this tool once (returned in-band), settle via an x402 client, then retry with the base64 payment payload either as the '_payment' argument or the X-PAYMENT HTTP header. Try token_intel_demo first — it is free and proves the pipeline live.

  • token_intel_demoFree

    Free. Returns the complete three-source intelligence report for a fixed sample token (BONK), exercising the exact production pipeline — verify output quality before paying for token_intel.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-13 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 861ms20/20
  • Tool poisoning2 tool descriptions checked15/15
  • Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
  • Maintenancelast push 2 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 91/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Solana Token Intelligence compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
91/100
higher than 85% of 48,255 servers
Tools
2
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Response time
65 ms
faster than 90% of 30,031 servers

What its tools let an agent do: 2 read

Install Solana Token Intelligence in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http token-intel https://token-intel.xrpbreadcrumbs.workers.dev/mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Solana Token Intelligence repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

token-intel-x402 — agent-native Solana token intelligence

One keyless call returns a fused safety + market read on any Solana token — mint/freeze authority, top-holder %, dev holdings, wash-trade (organic) score, liquidity, verification — plus a synthesized risk verdict (low-risk / caution / high-risk) with plain-language flags.

Gated by x402: an autonomous agent pays a $0.01 USDC micro-fee per call (Base or Solana) — no API key, no account, no signup. That is the differentiator: every rival (RugCheck, Birdeye, SolSniffer, GoPlus) needs a key and a signup; this is built for machine-to-machine payment.

Live: https://token-intel.xrpbreadcrumbs.workers.dev

GET  /api/token-intel?mint=<SPL_MINT>  # PAID (x402) → JSON intelligence
GET  /api/token-intel/demo             # free BONK sample (rate-limited, cached)
POST /mcp                              # MCP server: token_intel (paid) + token_intel_demo (free)
GET  /stats                            # public funnel: challenges, demos, paid calls, revenue
GET  /                                 # free: what it is + how to pay
GET  /healthz                          # free

Deploy (Cloudflare Workers)

Runs on the Workers free plan. v1 lived on Deno Deploy and was suspended when free traffic exceeded the free tier while paid calls stayed at zero; v2 rate-limits and caches the free demo so that can't recur, and records every step of the payment funnel in a D1 ledger.

npm install
npx wrangler d1 execute token-intel-ledger --remote --file schema.sql   # once
npx wrangler deploy

Wallets, price, and facilitator are [vars] in wrangler.toml (public addresses — no secrets).

Security by design

facilitator) are both keyless, so there is nothing here to steal.

  • No private keys, no API keys on the server — data (Jupiter) and payments (PayAI
  • Read-only toward the outside world; its only writes are an anonymous event ledger (no IPs, no PII) — near-zero attack surface.
  • Pay-to wallet is receive-only; its key never touches this host.
  • Every paid call requires payment first, so abuse costs the attacker money.
  • Input strictly validated (base58 mint) — no SSRF/injection.

Informational only, not financial advice, no warranty.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Solana Token Intelligence: common questions

Is Solana Token Intelligence MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (91/100). Read the Solana Token Intelligence safety report
How do I install Solana Token Intelligence?
It runs remotely at token-intel.xrpbreadcrumbs.workers.dev. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Solana Token Intelligence need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Solana Token Intelligence maintained?
The last commit was 24 days ago (2026-10-11). The latest release is v2.0.0.
Is Solana Token Intelligence up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
How does Solana Token Intelligence compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 91/100 (higher than 85% of 48,255 servers); tools 2 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.