Judgment Pack MCP server
io.github.Judgment-Pack/judgment-pack·v0.39.0·2 starsOffline JPS validator, conformance tester, and experimental evaluator over stdio MCP; keyless.
not scanned yet
2 stars
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Judgment Pack yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Judgment Pack tools
No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.
How Judgment Pack compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 85/100
- higher than 70% of 48,255 servers
- GitHub stars
- 2
- more than 75% of 28,688 servers
Release history: 15 versions in the registry since 2026-09-16, latest 2026-10-29, typically one every 2 days.
Install Judgment Pack in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add judgment-pack -- docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/judgment-pack/judgment-pack:0.39.0
What the publisher says
From the Judgment Pack repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
judgment-pack
Status: pre-1.0
Tagged binaries are official only when they appear on this repository's GitHub Releases page
with checksums.txt. Development checkouts may temporarily embed unreleased JPS snapshots, but
the release workflow rejects them.
judgment-pack is the vendor-neutral reference runtime for the Judgment Pack Specification (JPS). It is a reference implementation, not the only valid one: the normative specification, schemas, and conformance corpus are owned by the separate judgment-pack-spec repository, and an independent implementation is judged against the complete normative requirements of the conformance class it claims — not against this runtime. Results from the corpus published for the exact version it names are required evidence for such a claim and are not exhaustive evidence of it (§3.4.1).
The runtime validates documents. It does not fetch a source, authorize an action, or establish truth, organizational authority, safety, or operational fitness. It bundles two specification versions, 0.1.0-draft and 0.2.0-draft, and validates a document against the exact version that document declares; 0.1.0-draft defines carrier, structural, and semantic document conformance only, and 0.2.0-draft changes no part of the document format.
One shared evaluator applies the specification's §§7–8 resolution model per ADR-0007, and eight surfaces reach it: jpack experimental evaluate and evaluate-corpus, the project walk jpack packs test, the graph verbs jpack experimental graph evaluate and graph test, and the experimentalevaluate, experimentaltestpacks and experimentaltestgraphs MCP tools. The experimental namespace is a stability** statement: such a surface may change or be removed without compatibility promise. It is not a statement about conformance. That evaluator implements the evaluator conformance class Core 0.2.0-draft adds — the §8.2 input preflight, the §8.3 portable disposition with its RFC 8785 byte agreement, the §8.4 error classes and their fixed precedence, and the §10 limits — per ADR-0010 and ADR-0011. Only a pack declaring specVersion 0.2.0-draft is evaluated: §11 makes the declared value exact and requires an unedited 0.1.0-draft pack to be re-declared — one edit, the specVersion string, and nothing else in the document — before an implementation claiming this draft evaluates it, so any other version is refused as pack-not-conformant in the preflight phase.
This runtime's conformance claim is stated, in full and only, in CONFORMANCE.md. JPS §3.4.1 fixes the entire form such a claim may take — the class, one exact specVersion, the corpus version, the results obtained, and in the claim's own words that every row of that corpus version passed — so this README states no part of it and neither does any other surface: a partial restatement would be the partial claim §3.4.1 forbids. Read that file for the claim, its version scope, its evidence, and everything it does not assert, which includes anything at all about a pack, its facts, or the wisdom of acting on a disposition (§3.5). jpack experimental evaluate-corpus runs the bundled evaluation corpus and reports its rows — the evidence §3.4.1 requires of a claim of this class, and explicitly not exhaustive evidence of one; see CONFORMANCE.md.
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Judgment Pack: common questions
- Is Judgment Pack MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (85/100). Read the Judgment Pack safety report
- How do I install Judgment Pack?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does Judgment Pack need an API key?
- No secret keys are declared. It reads 1 setting from the environment.
- Is Judgment Pack maintained?
- The last commit was 32 days ago (2026-10-03). The latest release is v0.39.0.
- How does Judgment Pack compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 85/100 (higher than 70% of 48,255 servers); github stars 2 (more than 75% of 28,688 servers). Full comparison.