MCP.Market

MCP Cross-Model Delegation MCP server

by Jostophe-021·io.github.Jostophe-021/mcp-cross-model-delegation·v1.0.0

Local MCP framework for bounded cross-model delegation, routing and evidence verification.

B73/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B73/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
New

0 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed MCP Cross-Model Delegation yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

MCP Cross-Model Delegation tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How MCP Cross-Model Delegation compares

Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
73/100
higher than 42% of 4,460 AI and agents servers

Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-09-24, latest 2026-09-25, typically one every 1 day.

Install MCP Cross-Model Delegation in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add mcp-cross-model-delegation -- docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/jostophe-021/mcp-cross-model-delegation:1.0.0
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the MCP Cross-Model Delegation repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

MCP Cross-Model Delegation

English | Français

A security-conscious MCP bridge and research testbed for cross-model LLM delegation.

Status: Experimental / Research Preview (v0.1.0). This is a small, local-first example for studying whether bounded delegation helps an orchestrating model. It is not production-ready and does not claim that delegation improves quality, speed, cost, or token use. The first secondary provider is Gemini; the provider contract permits future implementations without changing the MCP tools.

Why this project exists

An orchestrator sometimes has a bounded task or a long context that a second model could process. The hypothesis is that delegation may reduce orchestrator context load or improve specialized processing, but may also add latency, cost, privacy risk, and error propagation. This repository supplies an inspectable bridge and a measurement plan; it contains no experimental results. See the research roadmap and benchmark schema.

flowchart TD
    A[Orchestrating LLM] --> B[MCP client]
    B --> C[Local MCP delegation server]
    C --> D[Validation and prompt boundary]
    D --> E[DelegationProvider]
    E --> F[Gemini API]
    F --> E --> D --> C --> B
    B --> G[Orchestrator verification and synthesis]

The orchestrator chooses what to send. The MCP server validates and bounds text. GeminiProvider calls Gemini. The orchestrator must verify the returned answer; the bridge does not verify factual accuracy.

MCP tools

Both tools accept text provided by the caller. They do not automatically read Google Drive, email, files, or user applications; execute code; or take actions in those applications. They cannot guarantee correctness. Treat evidence returned by Gemini as a claim to check against the original text.

Example calls with synthetic data:

gemini_delegate_task(task="Calculate 137 × 29 and explain the calculation briefly.")

gemini_extract_findings(
    question="What are the two numbers mentioned and their sum?",
    context="Monday: 12 tickets. Tuesday: 8 tickets."
)

Quick start

Requires Python 3.12+, uv, and a Gemini API key for real calls. Tests need no key.

git clone https://github.com/YOUR_GITHUB_USERNAME/mcp-cross-model-delegation.git
cd mcp-cross-model-delegation
cp .env.example .env
# Edit .env locally and replace GEMINI_API_KEY=replace-me with your own key.
uv sync --extra test
uv run --env-file .env python server.py

The streamable HTTP MCP endpoint is http://127.0.0.1:8000/mcp. Point a local MCP client at it. .env is ignored by Git. Do not paste your key into a command, issue, log, or chat. GEMINI_MODEL defaults to Google's documented stable gemini-3.5-flash-lite; users can choose another supported Gemini model through the environment. Confirm model availability and pricing for your own project.

Local development and Docker

uv sync --extra test
uv run pytest -q
uv run ruff check gateway.py server.py providers tests
docker build -t mcp-cross-model-delegation:0.1.0 .
# Linux host networking example; the MCP listener remains loopback-only.
docker run --rm --network host --env-file .env mcp-cross-model-delegation:0.1.0

The image contains no key. Docker Desktop host networking varies by platform; use a local Python run when host networking is unavailable. The server deliberately refuses MCP_HOST=0.0.0.0. To offer a network endpoint, add suitable client authentication and transport security rather than changing this guard in a shared deployment.

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

MCP Cross-Model Delegation: common questions

Is MCP Cross-Model Delegation MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (73/100). Read the MCP Cross-Model Delegation safety report
How do I install MCP Cross-Model Delegation?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does MCP Cross-Model Delegation need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for GEMINI_API_KEY, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY.
Is MCP Cross-Model Delegation maintained?
The last commit was 41 days ago (2026-09-24). The latest release is v1.0.0.
What can I use instead of MCP Cross-Model Delegation?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Figma Context MCP server, HOL Guard MCP server and Ts Core MCP server.

Alternatives to MCP Cross-Model Delegation

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Figma Context
    Give your coding agent access to your Figma data. Implement designs in any framework in one-shot.
    B
  • HOL Guard
    Local-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.
    A
  • Ts Core
    Agent-native TypeScript framework for building MCP servers.
    A
  • Watch Skill
    Watch video and live sessions, keep timestamped evidence, and verify an agent's own work.
    B
  • OpenWorkProof
    Verifiable agent evidence; opt-in Codex guard and reference SOC alert review.
    A