MCP.Market

Google Local MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by johnisanerd·io.github.johnisanerd/google-local·v1.0.1
No reviews yet

Find local businesses on Google: name, address, phone, hours, ratings, and photos.

A92/100grade A
Write a reviewRun it
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A92/100

full report

Adoption
New

0 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Google Local yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Google Local tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 7ms (auth required)20/20
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualityOAuth resource metadata advertised on 40115/15
  • Maintenancelast push 64 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 92/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Google Local compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
92/100
higher than 95% of 48,255 servers
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Response time
38 ms
faster than 94% of 30,031 servers

Install Google Local in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http google-local https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=johnvc/google-local-api
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Google Local repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Google Local MCP Server

Find local businesses on Google with full details: name, address, phone, hours, ratings, photos. Use with Claude or any MCP client.

This is a remote MCP server that lets Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, or any MCP client query Google Local directly as a tool call.

Install in Claude Desktop

Add this to your ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claudedesktopconfig.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-local": {
      "url": "https://apify.com/johnvc/google-local-api/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Restart Claude Desktop. The new tool will be available in your conversations.

Install in Cursor

Add this to your .cursor/mcp.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "google-local": {
      "url": "https://apify.com/johnvc/google-local-api/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

What it does

This MCP server lets Claude search Google Local for businesses by keyword and location. Returns business name, address, phone, hours, rating, review count, website, and category. Useful for sales prospecting, local SEO research, lead generation, and market analysis.

Example queries to try in Claude:

  • "Find all coffee shops within 2 miles of downtown Austin with 4+ star ratings"
  • "Get me the contact details for orthodontists in San Francisco"
  • "Find boutique law firms in Boston specializing in IP"

Built by

johnvc on Apify | Sign up for a free account here.

License

MIT

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Google Local: common questions

Is Google Local MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (92/100). Read the Google Local safety report
How do I install Google Local?
It runs remotely at mcp.apify.com. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Google Local need an API key?
No key to paste: it signs you in with OAuth when your client connects.
Is Google Local maintained?
The last commit was 101 days ago (2026-07-25). The latest release is v1.0.1.
Is Google Local up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
How does Google Local compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 92/100 (higher than 95% of 48,255 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 38 ms (faster than 94% of 30,031 servers). Full comparison.