Win Mind MCP server
io.github.jhonpork1233-beep/win-mind·v0.2.0·2 starsSee and drive any Windows app via the accessibility tree - no screenshots - plus 200+ native tools
2 stars
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Win Mind yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Win Mind tools
No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-01 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- –Code scanpackage could not be scannedn/a
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
How Win Mind compares
Against every graded Productivity MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 88/100
- higher than 75% of 1,299 Productivity servers
- GitHub stars
- 2
- more than 60% of 854 Productivity servers
Install Win Mind in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
The registry entry has no remote endpoint or installable package.
What the publisher says
From the Win Mind repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
WinMind
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.jhonpork1233-beep/win-mind -->
A Windows MCP server that lets an AI see and drive any app through the accessibility tree - no screenshots, no mouse, no pixel guessing - plus 200+ native Windows tools.
Most computer-use agents look at the screen: take a screenshot, send thousands of image tokens to a model, guess coordinates, click, take another screenshot. WinMind reads what Windows already knows. Every app publishes its buttons, text boxes, lists and text to UI Automation, the accessibility layer screen readers like Narrator and NVDA use. WinMind turns that into a compact, numbered tree an AI can read in one call and act on in the next - even when the app is behind other windows.
WhatsApp (WhatsApp.Root.exe, window)
├─ [6] banner
│ ├─ [7] button "Chats" (42) checked [toggle]
│ ├─ [8] button "Calls" (4) unchecked [toggle]
├─ [20] textbox "Search or start a new chat" [set_value]
├─ [21] tabs "chat-list-filters" (4)
│ ├─ [22] tab "All" selected [select]
│ ├─ [23] tab "Unread 42" [select]
├─ [26] grid "Chat list" (9)
│ ├─ [29] row "Alex Yesterday Photo" [click]
│ ├─ [30] row "Study Group 3 unread messages Yesterday" [click]
└─ [37] button "Send document" [click]uiact(ref=30) opens that chat. uiact(name="Play", title_contains="spotify") plays music. No screenshot was taken.
Why it's different
Things WinMind handles that trip up simpler UI Automation tools (details in docs/ARCHITECTURE.md):
covered - Chromium's occlusion tracking pauses them. WinMind wakes them properly once; the tree then stays readable in the background. It never pulls a window over a full-screen game.
- Chromium-based apps behind other windows (Discord, Spotify, Steam, Teams, VS Code) expose no content while
elements thousands of times. WinMind splits and de-duplicates: 7.3 s -> 0.25 s.
- WinUI 3 apps that host WebView2 (WhatsApp) loop back into their own web content - naive scans fetch the same
performs the default action of the element that really owns the click - without moving the mouse.
- Web clicks that silently do nothing: pressing a list item whose click handler sits on an inner link. WinMind
saying what was cut; errors are one actionable line, not tracebacks.
- Buttons and text in one tree: editor/document content comes through next to the controls.
- Finds apps by process, not just title (Spotify's title is the song playing), including apps hidden in the tray.
- Token budget: 222 tool definitions cost ~32k tokens (143 per tool); long outputs are trimmed with a note
What's in the box (222 tools)
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Win Mind: common questions
- Is Win Mind MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (88/100). Read the Win Mind safety report
- Does Win Mind need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Win Mind maintained?
- The last commit was 35 days ago (2026-09-30). The latest release is v0.2.0.
- What can I use instead of Win Mind?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Buoy Gg MCP server, Sparewise MCP server and Renforge MCP server.
- How does Win Mind compare with other Productivity MCP servers?
- safety score 88/100 (higher than 75% of 1,299 Productivity servers); github stars 2 (more than 60% of 854 Productivity servers). Full comparison.
Alternatives to Win Mind
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- Buoy GgLet AI agents read and drive a running React Native or Flutter app through Buoy's devtools.not reviewedEstablishedA
- SparewiseWhy is my Windows drive full? Free space within limits you set. Never deletes permanently.not reviewedGrowingA
- RenforgeInspect, drive and debug a running Ren'Py game: state, screenshots, guarded clicks, saves, builds.not reviewedGrowingA
- ArgentDrive iOS Simulators, Android emulators, TVs and Electron/web apps from your coding agentnot reviewedWidely usedA
- MCP Server for ExcelExcel automation for AI - Sheets, Power Query, DAX, VBA, Tables, Ranges and more. Windows only.not reviewedEstablishedA