MCP.Market

Jet Tracker MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by jettracker.com.br·br.com.jettracker/jet-tracker·v0.16.0

Brazilian business aviation: registry, owner, flights, base, market, maintenance and sale signals.

B77/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B77/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
New

Little public usage data yet

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Jet Tracker yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Jet Tracker tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How Jet Tracker compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
77/100
higher than 50% of 48,255 servers
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Response time
745 ms
faster than 18% of 30,031 servers

Release history: 4 versions in the registry since 2026-09-16, latest 2026-10-28, typically one every 7 days.

Install Jet Tracker in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http jet-tracker https://jettracker.com.br/api/mcp
Add to Cursor

Jet Tracker: common questions

Is Jet Tracker MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (77/100). Read the Jet Tracker safety report
How do I install Jet Tracker?
It runs remotely at jettracker.com.br. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Jet Tracker need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Jet Tracker maintained?
The latest release is v0.16.0.
Is Jet Tracker up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
How does Jet Tracker compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 77/100 (higher than 50% of 48,255 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 745 ms (faster than 18% of 30,031 servers). Full comparison.