MCP.Market

Skill MCP server

by jcc-ne·io.github.jcc-ne/mcp-skill-server·v0.1.2·1 stars

An MCP server that mounts your skill directory and add deterministic entry for deployment

B82/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B82/100

full report

Adoption
New

1 stars22 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Skill yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Skill tools (4, 1 write)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • get_skill

    Get skill details including commands and parameters

  • list_skills

    List all available skills

  • refresh_skills

    Refresh the skill list (use after adding new skills)

  • run_skillwrite action

    Execute a skill command with parameters

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-09-28 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan15 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 138 days ago8/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Skill compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
82/100
higher than 63% of 48,255 servers
Tools
4
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
25%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
GitHub stars
1
more than 65% of 28,688 servers
Downloads a week
22
more than 8% of 12,191 servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 3 read · 1 run or deploy

Install Skill in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add mcp-skill-server -- uvx mcp-skill-server
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Skill repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.jcc-ne/mcp-skill-server -->

Most coding assistants now support skills natively, so an MCP server just for skill discovery isn't necessary. Where this package adds value is making skills' execution deterministic and deployable — with a fixed entry point and controlled execution, skills developed in your editor can run in non-sandboxed production environments. It also supports incremental loading, so agents discover skills on demand instead of loading everything upfront.

MCP Skill Server

Build agent skills where you work. Write a Python script, add a SKILL.md, and your agent can use it immediately. Iterate in real-time as part of your daily workflow. When it's ready, deploy the same skill to production — no rewrite needed.

Why?

Most skill development looks like this: write code → deploy → test in a staging agent → realize it's wrong → redeploy → repeat. It's slow, and you never get to actually use the skill while building it.

MCP Skill Server flips this. It runs on your machine, inside your editor — Claude Code, Cursor, or Claude Desktop. You develop a skill and use it in your real work at the same time. That tight feedback loop (edit → save → use) means you discover what's missing naturally, not through artificial test scenarios. The premise is if the skill doesn't work well with Claude Code, it's unlikely to work with a less sophisticated agent.

How skills mature to survive in the outside world

Claude skills can already have companion scripts, but there's no formalized entry point — the agent decides how to invoke them. That works for local use, but it's not deployable: a production MCP server can't reliably call a skill if the execution path isn't fixed.

MCP Skill Server enforces a declared entry field in your SKILL.md frontmatter (e.g. entry: uv run python my_script.py). This gives you a single, fixed entry point that the server controls. Commands and parameters are discovered from the script's --help output — that's the source of truth, not the LLM's interpretation of your code.

1. Claude/coding agent skill                → SKILL.md + scripts, but no fixed entry — agent decides how to run them
2. Local MCP skill (+ entry)   → Fixed entry point, schema from --help, usable daily via this server
3. Production                  → Same skill, same entry — deployed to your enterprise MCP server

Sharpen locally, then harden for production

Every agent that connects to the MCP server gets the same interface — listskills, getskill, run_skill — so the skill's description, parameter names, and help text are identical regardless of which agent calls them. That said, different agents have different strengths — a skill that works locally still needs testing with your production agent.

  1. Use it yourself — build the skill, use it daily via Claude Code or Cursor. Fix descriptions and param names when the agent misuses the skill.
  2. Test with a weaker model — try a smaller model to surface interface ambiguity.
  3. Add a deterministic entry point — declare entry in SKILL.md for reliable, secure execution. Use skill init to scaffold it, skill validate to check readiness.
  4. Test with your production agent — verify end-to-end in your target environment, then deploy.

Install

Claude Desktop (one-click)

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Skill: common questions

Is Skill MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (82/100). Read the Skill safety report
How do I install Skill?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Skill need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Skill maintained?
The last commit was 175 days ago (2026-05-13). The latest release is v0.1.2.
How does Skill compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 82/100 (higher than 63% of 48,255 servers); tools 4 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 25% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.