Aperture MCP server
io.github.jaysinailabs/aperture-mcp·v0.2.0Flag when a tracked commitment vanishes verbatim between two versions. A signal, not a judge.
0 stars23 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Aperture MCP yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Aperture MCP tools (6)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postsRead from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.
aperture_feedbackcomparecompare_commitmentcompare_proposalcompare_stancehealthLiveness check; returns status + name + version.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- Code scan17 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 83 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
How Aperture MCP compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 88/100
- higher than 75% of 48,255 servers
- Tools
- 6
- the typical server has 7
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Downloads a week
- 23
- more than 9% of 12,191 servers with a package
What its tools let an agent do: 6 read
Install Aperture MCP in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add aperture-mcp -- uvx aperture-mcp
What the publisher says
From the Aperture MCP repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.jaysinailabs/aperture-mcp -->
Aperture
A commitment tripwire · git hook · CI · CLI · MCP
Did an agent quietly drop a commitment from your spec — and no one noticed?
English · 简体中文
AI agents now rewrite the documents that govern your work — specs, plans, ADRs, charters, AGENTS.md files. Somewhere in the edit, a constraint you set earlier can quietly disappear.
Aperture is a commitment tripwire. You name the commitments you care about; it flags — word for word — when one of them vanishes between two versions of a decision document.
Catching "a commitment silently vanished" is a tripwire job: it should fire on an event, deterministically, without asking permission. So Aperture ships that check on the surface that fits it best first — a git pre-commit hook / CI check that runs with no LLM, offline — and also as a CLI and an MCP server for agents to call mid-task. MCP is one adapter, not the whole product.
A signal, not a judge. It trips; you investigate.
Opt-in · runs locally · never trains on your data.
What it is (and what it is not)
Aperture compares two text states of the same decision — an earlier version and a later one — and surfaces a narrow, specific kind of decision drift: when a tracked commitment’s exact text disappeared. One engine, several surfaces:
model in the loop, and blocks (or warns) automatically.
- git pre-commit hook / CI check — the deterministic form. Fires on the commit / PR event with no
runs if the agent chooses to call it — but useful mid-task).
- aperture check CLI — run the same check by hand between any two git states.
- MCP server — so an agent can call the check while it edits (weaker as a tripwire, since it only
What the engine does and doesn’t do:
from version B — across commits, sessions, or authors. It returns a structured, comparable result with its own blind spots written on the label.
- ✅ It does: flag when a commitment you listed verbatim is present in version A and gone
misses a commitment that was reworded / softened / paraphrased (it looks dropped-free even though the promise weakened); it declines/abstains on a commitment that was merely translated (it can’t compare verbatim across scripts, so it returns degraded rather than false-flag); and it can still false-flag a commitment that was merely reformatted (the words moved, the meaning didn’t). It does not rank options, score quality, or tell you a change was wrong. That judgment stays with you. Moving to the deterministic git-hook makes the check fire reliably — it does not widen what it can see. Same narrow, verbatim signal.
- ❌ It does not: understand meaning. It matches text as a case-insensitive substring, so it
If you want one sentence: Aperture is grep for vanished commitments, wired to fire on commit — and honest enough to admit what it can’t see.
Quickstart (≈2 minutes)
pip install aperture-mcp # installs the `aperture` CLI + the MCP server (wire the CLI as a git hook — see below)The PyPI package is named aperture-mcp because the bare name aperture was already taken on
PyPI. The -mcp suffix is a historical package-name artifact — the product is Aperture, and
MCP is only one of its surfaces. One pip install gives you all three below.
1. The deterministic tripwire — git pre-commit hook / CI (no LLM, offline)
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Aperture MCP: common questions
- Is Aperture MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (88/100). Read the Aperture MCP safety report
- How do I install Aperture MCP?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does Aperture MCP need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Aperture MCP maintained?
- The last commit was 122 days ago (2026-07-05). The latest release is v0.2.0.
- How does Aperture MCP compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 88/100 (higher than 75% of 48,255 servers); tools 6 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.