MCP.Market

Rails MCP server

by jaimenbell·io.github.jaimenbell/rails-mcp·v0.1.0

Default-deny action registry, append-only spend ledger, and human sign-off audit trail (MCP tools).

A85/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A85/100

full report

Adoption
New

0 stars10 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Rails yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Rails tools (6)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • classify_action
  • evaluate_budget
  • get_rails_hash
  • get_signoff_state
  • is_action_registered
  • record_spend_intent

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-24 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan9 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 43 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Overall 85/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Rails compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
85/100
higher than 70% of 48,273 servers
Tools
6
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Downloads a week
10
more than 3% of 11,915 servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 5 read · 1 run or deploy

Install Rails in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add rails-mcp -- uvx rails-mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Rails repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

rails-mcp

A self-hosted, caller-configured default-deny action registry + append-only spend ledger + CLI-only sign-off audit trail, exposed as MCP tools. Different category from this author's other six MCP servers (mcp-factory, rag-mcp, bus-mcp, desktop-mcp, github-mcp, discord-mcp) -- those are devtools ("connect an agent to X"); this one is governance and safety: "stop an agent from doing something irreversible without a human noticing."

Ported and generalized from a live internal registry (shared/rails/, 31 tests, running against a real multi-bot fleet since 2026-07-06) -- this pattern shipped internally before it shipped publicly.

What this is / is not

Is:

unconditionally GATED (default-deny), registered or not.

  • A schema + pure logic for classifying action_type strings as

enforcement (enforcementlayer, enforcementpointer, ceremony) -- informational, never permissive.

  • A place to register what you know about an action-type's current

registry's current hash and when.

  • An append-only spend-intent ledger + rolling-window budget check.
  • An append-only human sign-off ledger, recording who blessed the

Is NOT:

anything by itself. You still wire it into your own PreToolUse hook, permission deny-list, or CI gate -- rails-mcp gives you the schema and the audit trail, not the interceptor. recordspendintent records intent to spend; it never calls a vendor, a paid API, or a broker, and nothing here stops an over-budget spend from happening.

  • Not an enforcer. classify_action returning GATED does not block

their own registry (a YAML/JSON config file, or a plain dict). No fleet's specific action-types ship with this package.

  • Not pre-loaded with any action-type data. Every adopter supplies

string per registry; fine for v1, a known limitation for later.

  • Not multi-tenant. The sign-off ledger assumes one human operator

The one invariant that is never configurable

classifyaction(actiontype) always returns "GATED" -- registered or not, whatever config was loaded, no argument or config field can change it. This is the whole product. A config-driven fail-open knob would defeat the entire pitch, so classify() (railsmcp/registry.py) takes only an actiontype argument: there is no parameter through which a caller could ever make it return anything permissive. isactionregistered answers a separate, purely informational question -- "do I know something about this action-type's enforcement?" -- and never feeds back into the GATED verdict.

Quickstart (60 seconds)

pip install rails-mcp

Add to your Claude Desktop/Code MCP config:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rails-mcp": {
      "command": "rails-mcp"
    }
  }
}

No console script on PATH? Fall back to "command": "python", "args": ["-m", "rails_mcp"].

By default the registry loads empty (honest-empty, not fail-open -- classify_action is still unconditionally GATED for everything). Point it at your own action-type config:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rails-mcp": {
      "command": "rails-mcp",
      "env": { "RAILS_MCP_CONFIG_PATH": "C:\\path\\to\\rails.config.yaml" }
    }
  }
}

See examples/rails.config.example.yaml (or .example.json) for the config shape.

Tools

All six are read-mostly -- none of them can write to the sign-off ledger.

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Rails: common questions

Is Rails MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (85/100). Read the Rails safety report
How do I install Rails?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Rails need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Rails maintained?
The last commit was 82 days ago (2026-08-12). The latest release is v0.1.0.
What can I use instead of Rails?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: SSH Manager MCP server and Tradememory Protocol MCP server.
How does Rails compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 85/100 (higher than 70% of 48,273 servers); tools 6 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Rails

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • SSH Manager
    SSH for AI agents: commands, files, backups and health, with approval, a vault and an audit trail
    A
  • Tradememory Protocol
    Tamper-evident decision audit trail and outcome-weighted memory for AI trading agents.
    B

More from jaimenbell →