MCP.Market

GreatArrow.ai MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by greatarrow.ai·ai.greatarrow/great-arrow·v1.1.0

Stop copy-pasting client context into your AI. 47 connectable providers via MCP.

B77/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B77/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
New

Little public usage data yet

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed GreatArrow.ai yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

GreatArrow.ai tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How GreatArrow.ai compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
77/100
higher than 50% of 48,243 servers
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Response time
481 ms
faster than 35% of 30,027 servers

Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-09-04, latest 2026-11-04, typically one every 61 days.

Install GreatArrow.ai in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http great-arrow https://www.greatarrow.ai/api/mcp
Add to Cursor

GreatArrow.ai: common questions

Is GreatArrow.ai MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (77/100). Read the GreatArrow.ai safety report
How do I install GreatArrow.ai?
It runs remotely at www.greatarrow.ai. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does GreatArrow.ai need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is GreatArrow.ai maintained?
The latest release is v1.1.0.
Is GreatArrow.ai up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
How does GreatArrow.ai compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 77/100 (higher than 50% of 48,243 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 481 ms (faster than 35% of 30,027 servers). Full comparison.