AETRE & The Governed Agent MCP server
io.github.grayclayton/aetre-mcp·v0.8.1Decision-theoretic triage and fail-closed agent gating: 32 tools over stdio.
0 stars
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed AETRE & The Governed Agent yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
AETRE & The Governed Agent tools
No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-14 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- –Code scanpackage could not be scannedn/a
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 24 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
How AETRE & The Governed Agent compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 88/100
- higher than 80% of 4,461 AI and agents servers
Release history: 4 versions in the registry since 2026-09-19, latest 2026-09-20, typically several a day.
Install AETRE & The Governed Agent in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
The registry entry has no remote endpoint or installable package.
What the publisher says
From the AETRE & The Governed Agent repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
AETRE & The Governed Agent: Unified Decision-Theoretic Operating System
"Governing Autonomous Intelligence in the Age of Abundance."
A high-performance, mathematically unified decision-theoretic operating system uniting macroeconomic proposal/portfolio triage (AETRE) and microeconomic execution governance (The Governed Agent).
Release status: experimental public alpha. The software and mathematical
simulations are testable, but the bundled data are synthetic and do not
establish prospective effectiveness in a live conference, grant, or
investment workflow. Use outputs as decision-support diagnostics, not as
autonomous acceptance, rejection, funding, or investment decisions.
Based on the research series by Clayton Gray (2026):
Clayton Gray (2026a) — SSRN: 7161458
- The Innovation-Absorption Gap: How Artificial Intelligence Can Accelerate Idea Production Faster Than Complementary Institutions Adapt
Clayton Gray (2026d) — distributed within the replication bundle The Implementation Frontier: Capital Allocation, Deliberative Stopping, and Verified Agent Gatekeeping (Zenodo: 10.5281/zenodo.22814799)
- The Admission Frontier: An Economically Regulated Decision-Theoretic Runtime and Fail-Closed Verification Gate for Autonomous Agents
This software is archived under its own DOI, separate from the papers above: AETRE: Adaptive Epistemic Triage & Recall Engine (Zenodo: 10.5281/zenodo.22098366).
The Problem: The Innovation-Absorption Gap
When Artificial Intelligence makes idea and action generation cheap ($c_{\text{gen}} \to 0$), proposal and execution volume ($N$) explodes. However, downstream evaluation, laboratory validation, code review, and human gatekeeper capacity ($K$) remain strictly finite.
This creates three critical pipeline pathologies:
$$E[Wq] \approx \frac{\rho}{1-\rho} \cdot \frac{ca^2 + c_s^2}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{\mu}$$
- The Kingman Delay Explosion: When evaluator utilization $\rho = \lambda / \mu$ approaches saturation ($\rho > 0.85$), wait times shoot up non-linearly according to Kingman's Heavy-Traffic equation:
$$RN \le \min\left(1, \frac{KN}{H_N}\right) \to 0 \quad \text{as } N \to \infty$$
- The Asymmetric Payoff Trap: In heavy-tailed domains like venture capital, breakthrough discovery, and agentic code patches (Pareto index $\alpha \approx 1.25$), consensus-seeking scoring systems penalize high-variance, transformative outliers in favor of safe, incremental proposals.
- The Finite-Capacity Recall Ceiling (Proposition 1): Without active epistemic triage, true breakthrough recall asymptotically decays towards zero as arrival rates surge:
Two-Layer Decision-Theoretic Architecture
AETRE unifies Macroeconomic Pipeline Triage (managing institutional review bandwidth and portfolio recall) with Microeconomic Execution Governance (safeguarding agentic execution runtimes and pull-request verification).
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
AETRE & The Governed Agent: common questions
- Is AETRE & The Governed Agent MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (88/100). Read the AETRE & The Governed Agent safety report
- Does AETRE & The Governed Agent need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is AETRE & The Governed Agent maintained?
- The last commit was 46 days ago (2026-09-20). The latest release is v0.8.1.
- What can I use instead of AETRE & The Governed Agent?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: CHAP Coordinator MCP server, agent-device MCP server and HOL Guard MCP server.
Alternatives to AETRE & The Governed Agent
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- CHAP CoordinatorAuditable records of human decisions over AI agent work. Approvals, edits, overrides, escalations.not reviewedEstablishedA
- agent-deviceOpen source device layer for AI agents: control mobile, web, TV, and desktop apps over MCPnot reviewedWidely usedA
- HOL GuardLocal-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.not reviewedEstablishedA
- Pm Claude Skills1310 professional Agent Skills + workflow recipes — searchable & fetchable over MCP.not reviewedEstablishedA
- MockserverMock, record/replay, verify and chaos-test any HTTP, REST, gRPC or LLM dependency over MCP.not reviewedEstablishedA