MCP.Market

LEEVAR reliability battery MCP server

by forevercrab321-svg·io.github.forevercrab321-svg/leevar·v0.1.0

Grade an AI agent's transcripts on 18 reliability tests. Thin evidence is NOT TESTED, not guessed.

B83/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B83/100

full report

Adoption
New

0 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed LEEVAR reliability battery yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

LEEVAR reliability battery tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-09-28 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanpackage could not be scannedn/a
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How LEEVAR reliability battery compares

Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
83/100
higher than 68% of 4,460 AI and agents servers

Install LEEVAR reliability battery in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

The registry entry has no remote endpoint or installable package.

What the publisher says

From the LEEVAR reliability battery repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

LEEVAR Battery

An 18-test, 6-dimension reliability battery for AI agents. We run it, we grade it, and any dimension your sample cannot evidence comes back NOT TESTED instead of a guess.

Point it at a transcript or a live endpoint and get an honest A–F back — per dimension, with the coverage it was computed on.

curl -s https://rzmsvvalhaqvxbuhpdnb.supabase.co/functions/v1/api-scan \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  -d '{"agent":{"name":"my-agent"},"mode":"transcript","email":"you@example.com",
       "transcript":["<a real work sample, not marketing copy>"]}'

No account. No API key. 5 free scans a month. Results are emailed and queryable.

Why NOT TESTED is the point

Most agent evals average over whatever they managed to measure. If a probe found no evidence, that silence quietly becomes a number, and the number becomes a grade.

This battery refuses. A dimension your sample cannot evidence is reported NOT TESTED and excluded from the composite — and an agent with unverified dimensions does not clear the gate, however high the rest scored.

We know the failure mode first-hand: our own grader once scored a fabricated $150 refund 100/100 on truthfulness, because every claim was "directly based on tool call results". The claims were. The tool results were fiction. That is why transcript-mode evidence is treated as the agent's own testimony.

When we refuse to grade

This is the part worth reading before you spend a call on us.

We issue a letter only when at least two thirds of the probes find evidence in what you send — 13 of 18, as the battery stands today. Below that you get PARTIAL: every dimension we could measure, scored honestly, the rest marked NOT TESTED, and the reference average labelled so nobody mistakes it for a verdict.

PARTIAL — 12/18 tests evidenced, no grade issued

We are not grading this agent. Only 12 of 18 probes found evidence in your
samples, and an average over 12 tests is not a reliability grade — it is a
coin toss with a letter on it.

For reference only, over the 12 evidenced tests: 96.2/100.
Do not deploy on this number.

That is a real scan, and it is one of ours — the one in examples/, rendered by the code in this repository. 96.2 is higher than a scan we published an A for. The gate refused it anyway, on coverage. (The report on the day said 96.6; why the two differ.)

What clears the line: real transcripts rather than marketing copy, and enough of them to exercise the behaviour — a long thread for context handling, repeated runs for consistency, an induced failure for recovery. A thin sample does not produce a generous score; it produces NOT TESTED.

Run it yourself — the scanner is in this repository

Everything above describes the hosted run. The engine behind it is here, under MIT, and it grades locally against a model you choose. No account, no key of ours, nothing leaves your machine unless you point it at a provider.

# Deno 2.x — one binary, no package install, no node_modules
curl -fsSL https://deno.land/install.sh | sh

git clone https://github.com/forevercrab321-svg/leevar-battery
cd leevar-battery

deno task demo      # the full 18-test battery, no model, no network, no cost

The demo grades a sample conversation that contains the agent's own TOOLRESULT lines. Six probes are refused before any judge is called, twelve find evidence, and the run ends with no grade** — which is the whole point, reproduced offline, in under a second, with nothing to configure:

## PARTIAL — 12/18 tests evidenced, no grade issued

Then point it at a real model and a real transcript:

# see where your transcript would go, and what it could cost, before sending it
deno task scan --transcript ./samples.json --provider anthropic --dry-run

# provider  anthropic
# endpoint  https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

LEEVAR reliability battery: common questions

Is LEEVAR reliability battery MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (83/100). Read the LEEVAR reliability battery safety report
Does LEEVAR reliability battery need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is LEEVAR reliability battery maintained?
The last commit was 37 days ago (2026-09-28). The latest release is v0.1.0.
What can I use instead of LEEVAR reliability battery?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: HOL Guard MCP server, Watch Skill MCP server and OpenWorkProof MCP server.

Alternatives to LEEVAR reliability battery

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • HOL Guard
    Local-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.
    A
  • Watch Skill
    Watch video and live sessions, keep timestamped evidence, and verify an agent's own work.
    B
  • OpenWorkProof
    Verifiable agent evidence; opt-in Codex guard and reference SOC alert review.
    A
  • Mockserver
    Mock, record/replay, verify and chaos-test any HTTP, REST, gRPC or LLM dependency over MCP.
    A
  • Attestix
    AI agent identity, signed credentials, delegated authority and governance evidence.
    A