MCP.Market

Infobroker MCP server

by flukeatzerocool·io.github.flukeatzerocool/infobroker·v2026.10.28

Multi-provider research MCP server: unified web search, fact-checking, personal knowledge base.

A89/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A89/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
Growing

0 stars117 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Infobroker yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Infobroker tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How Infobroker compares

Against every graded Web search MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
89/100
higher than 85% of 3,470 Web search servers
Downloads a week
117
more than 60% of 827 Web search servers with a package

Release history: 5 versions in the registry since 2026-09-14, latest 2026-10-28, typically one every 9 days.

Install Infobroker in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

Runs npx -y infobroker on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.

claude mcp add infobroker -- npx -y infobroker
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Infobroker repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

<!-- README DESIGN:

Product principle. The README is the product — it answers three questions in under 60 seconds: what this does, why you should care, how to use it. Readme-driven development: changes that affect the README's claims SHALL update the README before or alongside the code change. A README that promises something the server does not deliver is a defect. Every numeric claim (tool count, provider count, zero-config count) reconciles against src/index.ts and config.json — the validator enforces this (Surface reconciliation).

Voice: Professional, confident, benefit-first. Direct address ("you"). No first-person ("we", "I", "our"). Short declarative fragments in the tagline. Every sentence survives a reader who knows nothing about Infobroker.

Demo: Natural-language prompts in blockquotes ("Search for..."), never full tool names (infobrokersearchweb). Show the reader how to express what they want — the AI maps intent to tools. Every demo prompt SHALL be a valid natural-language command the reader could actually run; broken prompts are a README defect.

Structure: Hero → North Star → Quick Start → MCP Server (§3 features) → Skills → Providers → Configuration → How It Compares → Contribute → License → Spec. No other ordering. Canonical h2 headings are enforced by validate-readme. A TOC listing the canonical h2 sections follows the Hero; validate-readme enforces TOC↔heading sync.

Audience split: §2 is for developers who want to start the server. §3 describes what users can do with it. The Skills section (§3.5) describes the bundled client skills and instructions. §4-5 are configuration. §6 is competitive context. §7-9 are contributor/license/spec.

Skills section: Prose only — no tables, no blockquotes, no feature bullet lists. Lists the six bundled skills and the workflow shapes the orchestrator routes to, with analysis-loop as the escalation shape. Cross-links to the skill references (pipeline-map.md, workflows.md).

No repetition. One story vector per section. Don't explain the same concept in two places — the validator flags near-duplicate sentences. No feature bullet lists in prose. No tables for feature descriptions.

Feature blurbs: Each h3 under §3 follows a four-beat cadence — benefit hook, mechanics, competitive proof, closer. The competitive-proof sentence contrasts Infobroker against the current tool landscape without naming individual competitors; it answers "why this beats what you're used to."

MCP server order: Features under §3 follow a research workflow — Search → Extract → Verify → Write → Manage. New features insert at the workflow point they serve; reorder the section to restore the workflow after every addition or removal.

Comparison table: Three columns (Tool name | What you're used to | How Infobroker differs). One row per competitor category, never individual products. Prose paragraph below synthesizes the table; it never repeats a row's content verbatim.

Hero: Exactly three elements — h1 heading, bold tagline, one prose paragraph. No sub-headings, bullet lists, or preamble paragraphs. The tagline uses short declarative fragments separated by periods — never a sentence or question. Enforced maximum 200 words (validate-readme). The tagline "One server. Every source. Research that delivers." is the repeated refrain — it appears exactly twice, in the Hero tagline and the comparison closing prose, and no more. The hero paragraph closes with "Free first. Privacy always." — distinct from the tagline. Updating any repeated line requires updating its echo.

North Star: Single paragraph stating the Bothan Spynet metaphor and intelligence-cycle framing. No sub-headings, lists, or blockquotes. Maximum 100 words (enforced by validate-readme).

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Infobroker: common questions

Is Infobroker MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (89/100). Read the Infobroker safety report
How do I install Infobroker?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Infobroker need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for INFOBROKER_BRAVE_API_KEY, INFOBROKER_EXA_API_KEY, INFOBROKER_TAVILY_API_KEY, INFOBROKER_YEP_API_KEY.
Is Infobroker maintained?
The last commit was 32 days ago (2026-10-03). The latest release is v2026.10.28.
What can I use instead of Infobroker?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Exa MCP server, Zotero MCP server and Perplexity API Platform (moved to ai.perplexity/mcp-server). Compare all Infobroker alternatives.
How does Infobroker compare with other Web search MCP servers?
safety score 89/100 (higher than 85% of 3,470 Web search servers); downloads a week 117 (more than 60% of 827 Web search servers with a package). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Infobroker

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

All Infobroker alternatives →
  • Exa
    Connect AI agents to Exa for web search, content fetching, and multi-step research.
    A
  • Zotero MCP
    Search, read, annotate, and add to your Zotero research library, local or web.
    B
  • Perplexity API Platform (moved to ai.perplexity/mcp-server)
    Real-time web search, reasoning, and research through Perplexity's API
    A
  • Perplexity API Platform
    Real-time web search, reasoning, and research through Perplexity's API
    A
  • webclaw
    Web scraping, search, crawling, structured extraction and research for AI agents.
    A