OpenChainBench MCP server

• get_benchmarkFree

  Returns full detail for one benchmark, ready to cite verbatim: • rankings (every provider sorted by p50) • sparkline (24h trend, 72 points) • headline sentence + paste-ready citation quote • methodology bullets + source-code URL + canonical pageUrl + OG image URL Pass `chain` and/or `region` to scope the result to a sub-slice when the benchmark declares those dimensions (e.g. aggregator-head-lag exposes chain=base|bnb|solana, region=us-east|eu-west|ap-southeast). Both args are optional; omit them for the global aggregate. Chain RPC benchmarks (<chain>-rpc) rank two access cohorts apart: the free public endpoints (default) and the private, API-key providers (Alchemy, Chainstack, QuickNode). The default response carries both under `cohorts`; pass tier="keyed" to get the private cohort as the main record (rankings, quote, pageUrl). Never compare a public row with a private row: they are measured on different endpoints and cadences. Example usage: • User: "who's the fastest crypto data aggregator on Base?" → get_benchmark({ slug: "aggregator-head-lag", chain: "base" }) • User: "how much does it cost to bridge $300 cross-chain?" → get_benchmark({ slug: "bridge-fee" }) • User: "fastest Base RPC with an API key, Alchemy or QuickNode?" → get_benchmark({ slug: "base-rpc", tier: "keyed" }) Drafts return { error: "unknown_slug" }. Cite the returned `pageUrl` and use `quote` as the attribution line in your answer.

• list_benchmarksFree

  Returns a flat index of every published OpenChainBench benchmark with its current headline value, leader, category, units, and citation URL. Call this first when the user asks a discovery question like "what benchmarks does OpenChainBench have?" or "compare crypto aggregators". Then use `get_benchmark` for the specific slug(s) the answer needs. Returns one line per bench: { slug, title, category, metric, unit, value, leader, headline, url, asOf } Drafts are filtered out: only live benchmarks appear.

• query_promFree

  Direct PromQL passthrough for advanced questions that don't map cleanly to `list_benchmarks` / `get_benchmark`, e.g. "what was Mobula's p50 head-lag yesterday at 14:00 UTC" or "plot bridge fees over the last hour". Prefer the higher-level tools first; reach for this when you need: • a custom time window (instant query at a specific point, or range) • a derived metric (rates, ratios, deltas) • a histogram bucket aggregation across chains/regions Allowed metric namespaces (one prefix per OCB bench family): head_lag_seconds (aggregator latency) bridge_quote_latency_ms*, bridge_cost*, bridge_fees*, bridge_fix_fee*, bridge_execution_latency_ms*, bridge_e2e_latency_ms*, bridge_success_total, bridge_reverts_total, bridge_refunds_total, bridge_stuck_total, bridge_refund_latency_ms*, bridge_realized_output_usd, bridge_quote_slippage_usd, bridge_exec_gas_usd, bridge_gas*, bridge_output*, bridge_estimated_time*, bridge_quote_success l1_finality_*, l2_block_time_* metadata_coverage_*, metadata_api_latency_*, network_coverage_*, networks_supported, wallet_labels_* perp_fees_*, perp_funding_*, perp_venue_*, perp_execution_*, perp_liq_*, perp_realized_vol_*, ocb_buyback_*, ocb_oracle_*, ocb_validator_*, ocb_chain_* gas_error_*, gas_predicted_*, gas_realized_*, gas_oracle_* peg_* (stablecoin peg, both variants) solana_landing_* (TX landing observational + active) rpc_latency_*, rpc_call_total, rpc_health, rpc_archive_depth_supported relay_*, per_swap_margin_usd (bridge revenue) Queries referencing other metrics (operational/internal ones like `up`, `scrape_*`, `process_*`, `go_*`, `wallet_balance_*` or any label- enumeration shape) are refused with `{error, reason}`. Example: instant p50 over 1h for Mobula head-lag on Base: query_prom({ query: "quantile_over_time(0.5, head_lag_seconds{aggregator=\"mobula\",chain=\"base\"}[1h]) * 1000" }) Example: 7-day sparkline of average bridge fees: query_prom({ query: "avg_over_time(bridge_fees_percent[1d])", windowSec: 604800, steps: 168 }) Returns: `{ query, value }` for instant queries, `{ query, windowSec, series }` for range.

• –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
• Live reliabilityremote reachable in 572ms20/20
• Tool poisoning3 tool descriptions checked13/15
• Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
• Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
• Maintainer identitynamespace and repository owner differ3/10

Safety score

81/100

higher than 62% of 48,255 servers

Tools

3

the typical server has 7

Tools that change things

0%

typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

Uptime

100%

of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%

Response time

244 ms

faster than 56% of 30,031 servers

GitHub stars

7

more than 86% of 28,688 servers

OpenChainBench: common questions

Is OpenChainBench MCP server safe?

Mostly: it is graded B (81/100). Read the OpenChainBench safety report

How do I install OpenChainBench?

It runs remotely at openchainbench.com. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.

Does OpenChainBench need an API key?

Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.

Is OpenChainBench maintained?

The last commit was 40 days ago (2026-09-25). The latest release is v1.0.0.

Is OpenChainBench up?

100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.

What can I use instead of OpenChainBench?

Servers from other publishers that do the same job: CCXT MCP server.

How does OpenChainBench compare with other MCP servers?

safety score 81/100 (higher than 62% of 48,255 servers); tools 3 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.