Trail Split MCP server
Plan shared gear, food, weight and cost across a group trip so nothing is carried twice and...
B83/100grade B
Adoption
New
0 stars
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Trail Split yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Trail Split tools
No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
no findings
- –Code scanpackage could not be scannedn/a
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 1 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Overall 83/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
How Trail Split compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 83/100
- higher than 65% of 48,255 servers
Install Trail Split in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
The registry entry has no remote endpoint or installable package.
Trail Split: common questions
- Is Trail Split MCP server safe?
- Mostly: it is graded B (83/100). Read the Trail Split safety report
- Does Trail Split need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Trail Split maintained?
- The last commit was 10 days ago (2026-10-25). The latest release is v0.1.3.
- What can I use instead of Trail Split?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Claudexor MCP server.
Alternatives to Trail Split
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- ClaudexorRoute coding work across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and OpenCode with shared context.not reviewedEstablishedA
