MCP.Market

Jev Decision Gate by BPJ MCP server

by f-tiger·io.github.f-tiger/jev-decision-gate·v0.3.1

Local Issue triage with optional Jev judgments and calibrated acceptance gates.

A88/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A88/100

full report

Adoption
New

0 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Jev Decision Gate by BPJ yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Jev Decision Gate by BPJ tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-02 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanpackage could not be scannedn/a
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 88/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Jev Decision Gate by BPJ compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
88/100
higher than 75% of 48,255 servers

Install Jev Decision Gate by BPJ in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

The registry entry has no remote endpoint or installable package.

What the publisher says

From the Jev Decision Gate by BPJ repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Jev Decision Gate · by BPJ

Use Jev for Issue triage without building the whole integration and review workflow.

中文 · MCP setup · Evaluation method · BPJ developer tools

Why install ours? Get six MCP tools for local Issue batches, task/usage checks, independent calibration, held-out evaluation and accept/review recommendations. The same workflow is available as a Skill or CLI. LLM vs direct Jev vs our MCP.

Underlying model prices: about 238× difference, with the same hypothetical input volume. Standard uncached prices on 2026-10-02: Claude Fable 5.1 $10/M input tokens; Jev 1.13 $0.042/M. Against Haiku 4.5 ($1/M), the ratio is 23.8×. Direct Jev and our MCP share this Jev input price. This compares model input unit prices; total workflow cost depends on actual usage, output, retries and agent-host charges.

Price math and assumptions · Static image · Actual rules output

An independent MIT-licensed Python tool for repository maintainers. Run a rules baseline, optionally call TypeSafe's Jev, and calibrate which suggestions may be accepted. The first case predicts issue kind, affected module and information sufficiency. It never edits issues, applies labels, posts comments or closes tickets.

Version 0.3.1, early developer preview. This is an integration and statistical gate, not Jev's model, training algorithm, or an official TypeSafe product. The bundled cases are 12 original synthetic examples for trying the workflow.

Run in two minutes

Python 3.11+:

git clone https://github.com/f-tiger/jev-decision-gate.git
cd jev-decision-gate
python -m venv .venv
# macOS / Linux
source .venv/bin/activate
# Windows PowerShell: .venv\Scripts\Activate.ps1
python -m pip install '.[mcp]'
jev-gate demo --out demo-report.json --export-issues demo-issues.json

The demo runs locally without keys or network requests. It produces real output from a deliberately simple rules baseline. All items initially require review. Keep the report: compare on your own labels before choosing a provider. Commands refuse to overwrite existing output files.

Reproduce the animation's price calculation without a key:

python tools/price_scenario.py --input-tokens 1000000 --fallback-fraction 0.1

This scenario is $0.042 for Jev input plus $1 for an extra 10% of that input sent to Fable, or $1.042 versus $10. The 9.6× input-cost ratio is hypothetical, excludes output/retries/review, and does not imply this package calls Fable. Share a successful run or a blocker.

Call Jev on selected issues

Set TYPESAFEAPIKEY through your local environment or secret manager. Do not paste a key into an issue, model chat, repository or MCP configuration committed to Git. Jev mode sends selected title/body text to https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone; BPJ receives nothing.

jev-gate triage demo-issues.json --provider jev --max-calls 12 --out jev-report.json

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Jev Decision Gate by BPJ: common questions

Is Jev Decision Gate by BPJ MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (88/100). Read the Jev Decision Gate by BPJ safety report
Does Jev Decision Gate by BPJ need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Jev Decision Gate by BPJ maintained?
The last commit was 33 days ago (2026-10-02). The latest release is v0.3.1.

More from f-tiger →