UMich Dining MCP server
online · 100% uptimeby esreddy2·
io.github.esreddy2/umich-dining-mcp·v2.0.0Menus, traits, allergens, nutrition and hours of the ten University of Michigan dining halls.
A89/100grade A
Safety scan
A89/100
not scanned yet
Adoption
New
0 stars0 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed UMich Dining yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
UMich Dining tools
Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.
How UMich Dining compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 89/100
- higher than 80% of 48,255 servers
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
- Response time
- 202 ms
- faster than 63% of 30,031 servers
Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-10-21, latest 2026-10-29, typically one every 8 days.
Install UMich Dining in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add --transport http umich-dining-mcp https://umich-dining-mcp.duckdns.org/mcp
UMich Dining: common questions
- Is UMich Dining MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (89/100). Read the UMich Dining safety report
- How do I install UMich Dining?
- It runs remotely at umich-dining-mcp.duckdns.org. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
- Does UMich Dining need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is UMich Dining maintained?
- The last commit was 9 days ago (2026-10-26). The latest release is v2.0.0.
- Is UMich Dining up?
- 100% of our last 16 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
- How does UMich Dining compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 89/100 (higher than 80% of 48,255 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 202 ms (faster than 63% of 30,031 servers). Full comparison.