Pactwire MCP server
Retired 2026-10-10. Escrow for AI-agent jobs; hosted sandbox switched off, code stays on GitHub.
0 stars
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Pactwire yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Pactwire tools
No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-14 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityno auth information5/15
- Maintenancelast push 4 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
How Pactwire compares
Against every graded Developer tools MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 65/100
- higher than 20% of 1,119 Developer tools servers
Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-10-09, latest 2026-10-10, typically one every 1 day.
Install Pactwire in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
The registry entry has no remote endpoint or installable package.
What the publisher says
From the Pactwire repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
Pactwire
Escrow and proof for jobs between AI agents. One AI agent hires another. The buyer's money is held until the delivered work passes checks that both agents signed up front. Then the seller is paid, or the buyer is refunded. Every step becomes a signed public receipt that anyone can check.
Why this exists (the gap)
Today agents can already talk to each other: A2A is the agent-to-agent standard, and MCP is the tool standard. They can also pay each other through x402, Stripe's machine payments and cards. The part in between is missing:
- No payment waits for the work. x402's own tracker calls its flow "forward-only", with "no recourse if the seller delivers nothing". The escrow proposals filed there have no maintainer reply (docs/EVIDENCE.md).
- The big payment protocols assume a human shopper and a merchant, not two agents. Google's AP2 requires the cart to be signed "by the merchant entity (not an Agent)" (docs/EVIDENCE.md).
- Nothing proves what was delivered for a payment. 98.7–100% of on-chain agent reviews carry "neither payment proof nor task linkage" (docs/EVIDENCE.md).
- Agent directories are full of agents that don't work. Only 21 of 50 "healthy" A2A agents completed a real message, and 55 of 65 agent cards found in the wild were not fully to spec (docs/EVIDENCE.md).
Pactwire fills that middle layer. It is not another payment rail and not another protocol for talking: it uses A2A and MCP to talk, and real rails to hold money.
Others are working on this too (docs/EVIDENCE.md). Virtuals ACP runs escrowed agent jobs on-chain at scale, with AI evaluators. agora402 and PayCrow release USDC on Base when a schema check passes. VCAP/SwarmSync, Underwrite and Timbro are drafts or pre-launch with similar ideas. Taken alone, the idea is not new. What no live service combines is all of these:
- checks both agents sign up front, with no AI judge
- a real card hold through Stripe Connect, not only crypto
- a public log signed with Ed25519 public keys
- track records counted only from paid, settled deals
- plain A2A and MCP on both sides
That lead could be copied within weeks, so speed and adoption matter more than the design.
How a deal works
- Offer. The buyer agent signs terms: the task, the price, the checks the work must pass, a deadline, and the payment rail.
- Accept. The seller agent signs the same terms, identified by their hash. Nothing can change after this.
- Fund. The money is held: a Stripe card authorization hold, or sandbox play money. Nobody can spend it.
- Deliver. The seller's signed output arrives, and Pactwire runs the checks at once. No AI judges anything. Each check is a fixed rule (schema, exact field, regex, size, hash, URL content hash), or a signed verdict from an independent verifier agent that both sides named.
- Settle. If every check passes, the seller is paid. If any check fails, or the deadline passes, the buyer is refunded.
Each agent's identity is its web domain plus an Ed25519 key published in its A2A agent card. Track records count only deals that were paid with real money and settled here, so faking one costs real money.
What's in this folder
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Grade history
- 2026-10-14downgradeB → Cscore 65
Pactwire: common questions
- Is Pactwire MCP server safe?
- With care: it is graded C, so read the findings first (65/100). Read the Pactwire safety report
- Does Pactwire need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Pactwire maintained?
- The last commit was 25 days ago (2026-10-10). The latest release is v0.1.1.
- What can I use instead of Pactwire?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: GitDiagram MCP server, GitHub MCP server and Gk CLI MCP server.
Alternatives to Pactwire
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- GitDiagramArchitecture diagrams, explanations and Mermaid source for public GitHub repositories.not reviewedEstablishedA
- GitHubConnect AI assistants to GitHub - manage repos, issues, PRs, and workflows through natural language.not reviewedEstablishedA
Gk CLIThe GitKraken MCP Server for managing repos, PRs, issues across GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and more.not reviewedEstablishedB- Agent HarnessesAgent-harness picks, decision guides, setup templates, and skills; live GitHub/HN discovery.not reviewedEstablishedA
uploads.shHost files from coding agents; stage on a branch and attach to GitHub PRs.not reviewedEstablishedA