MCP.Market

Enviadores MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by enviadores.com.mx·mx.com.enviadores/shipping·v1.3.1
No reviews yet

Multi-carrier shipping in Mexico: grouped rates, labels, tracking, pickups, address book, webhooks.

B77/100grade B
Write a reviewRun it
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B77/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
New

Little public usage data yet

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Enviadores yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Enviadores tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How Enviadores compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
77/100
higher than 50% of 48,243 servers
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Response time
537 ms
faster than 31% of 30,027 servers

Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-09-05, latest 2026-10-25, typically one every 50 days.

Install Enviadores in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http shipping https://api.enviadores.com.mx/api/v1/mcp
Add to Cursor

Enviadores: common questions

Is Enviadores MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (77/100). Read the Enviadores safety report
How do I install Enviadores?
It runs remotely at api.enviadores.com.mx. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Enviadores need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Enviadores maintained?
The latest release is v1.3.1.
Is Enviadores up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
How does Enviadores compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 77/100 (higher than 50% of 48,243 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 537 ms (faster than 31% of 30,027 servers). Full comparison.