Taskbounty Check MCP server
Local GitHub Actions/CI maintenance check (action pinning, token perms). Not a full security audit.
2 stars52 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Taskbounty Check yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Taskbounty Check tools (3)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postsRead from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.
explain_findingExplain what a finding means and why it matters, in plain language. Pass the rule id (e.g. unpinned-action) or a category. No network, no file access.
generate_fix_planReturn a step-by-step fix plan as TEXT for a given rule (and optionally a local repo path for context). It NEVER modifies files; the user applies changes explicitly.
scan_repoScan a LOCAL repository for GitHub Actions + CI maintenance hygiene. Reads only workflow files on disk; makes no network requests and uploads nothing. Returns a text summary of findings by category with file/line and suggested fixes.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- Code scan11 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 97 days ago8/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
How Taskbounty Check compares
Against every graded Developer tools MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 78/100
- higher than 50% of 1,119 Developer tools servers
- Tools
- 3
- the typical Developer tools server has 7
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 5%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- GitHub stars
- 2
- more than 65% of 855 Developer tools servers
- Downloads a week
- 52
- more than 39% of 436 Developer tools servers with a package
What its tools let an agent do: 2 read · 1 create
Install Taskbounty Check in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
Runs npx -y taskbounty-check on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.
claude mcp add taskbounty-check -- npx -y taskbounty-check
What the publisher says
From the Taskbounty Check repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
taskbounty-check
A local check for GitHub Actions and CI maintenance hygiene (third-party action pinning, workflow token permissions, and update automation), built for apps shipped with Lovable, Bolt, Replit, Cursor, or v0.
Local by default. No uploads. No telemetry. It reads only your workflow files, on your machine. The default code path makes no outbound network requests, writes its report locally, and sends nothing anywhere. There is no analytics or phone-home of any kind. Only the opt-in --gh-org mode uses the network (through your own gh session).
Works with Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex (local MCP server, below).
Three ways to use it
1. GitHub Action — add a maintenance check to CI that writes a summary to the run (no PR comments, no source upload):
permissions:
contents: read
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- run: npx taskbounty-check@0.1.6 . --github-summary --no-networkWant a human to interpret or fix what the Action surfaces? Request a free launch-safety review. TaskBounty gets no access to your repo, source, or workflows unless you submit that form.
2. Agent / MCP — a local stdio server for Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex:
npx -y taskbounty-check@0.1.6 mcp3. One-off CLI — scan the current repo locally and write a report:
npx -y taskbounty-check@0.1.6 .Pin a version (@0.1.6) in committed config and CI for reproducibility. @latest is convenient
for a quick one-off, but a pinned version is the reproducible choice.
The GitHub job summary
The Action writes a counts-only maintenance summary to the workflow run (categories and next steps, no filenames, line numbers, or repo source). Below is that exact summary, rendered from this repo's own CI output:
See it produced live by the self-check job in this repository's Actions runs.
Prefer a guided walkthrough? Follow the five-minute real-repository quickstart.
Learn more
- Methodology — exactly what it reviews and how findings are labeled.
- Privacy and scope — local-by-default data handling.
- Limitations — what it does NOT check (below).
Supported checks (and honest limitations)
Checks (GitHub Actions + CI maintenance hygiene):
- Third-party actions pinned to a movable tag/branch instead of a commit SHA
- Broad (write-all) workflow token permissions
- Missing explicit permissions: block
- Update automation (Dependabot/Renovate) presence
- Context-dependent workflow patterns flagged for private review (e.g. pullrequesttarget, script injection)
Does NOT check (these need a manual review): exposed secrets, auth/authorization, payments, webhooks, runtime behavior. It is a maintenance/hygiene check, not a full security audit or a penetration test.
What it does
in-process with a deterministic ruleset (the same rules as the public checker), and writes a local HTML + JSON report. It does not execute workflows, install dependencies, or run any repository code.
- Reads only your GitHub Actions workflow files and update-automation config, scans them
Modes
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Taskbounty Check: common questions
- Is Taskbounty Check MCP server safe?
- Mostly: it is graded B (78/100). Read the Taskbounty Check safety report
- How do I install Taskbounty Check?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does Taskbounty Check need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Taskbounty Check maintained?
- The last commit was 136 days ago (2026-06-21). The latest release is v0.1.6.
- What can I use instead of Taskbounty Check?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Github MCP server, cloud-audit MCP server and Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency Analysis MCP server.
- How does Taskbounty Check compare with other Developer tools MCP servers?
- safety score 78/100 (higher than 50% of 1,119 Developer tools servers); tools 3 (the typical Developer tools server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 5%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.
Alternatives to Taskbounty Check
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- GithubMCP server for GitHub operations (PRs, issues, actions) with structured, token-efficient outputnot reviewedGrowingA
- cloud-auditAWS security scanner with attack chain detection, IAM privilege escalation, and fixesnot reviewedEstablishedA
- Grasp — Code Architecture & Dependency AnalysisCodebase analysis: dependency graphs, security scanning, and refactor plans for GitHub and GitLab.not reviewedGrowingC
- zanadirFind what a repository's CI is missing, and which security checks cannot fail the build.not reviewedGrowingB
- GntGit-native policy layer for AI agents: check_action verdicts against rules approved via PR.not reviewedGrowingA