MCP.Market

Sourceright MCP server

by edithatogo·io.github.edithatogo/sourceright·v0.1.20·1 stars

Reference verification MCP server for CSL bibliographies, evidence, and audited writes.

A88/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A88/100

full report

Adoption
New

1 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Sourceright yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Sourceright tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanpackage could not be scannedn/a
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 9 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 88/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Sourceright compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
88/100
higher than 75% of 48,255 servers
GitHub stars
1
more than 65% of 28,688 servers

Install Sourceright in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add sourceright -- docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/edithatogo/sourceright-mcp:0.1.20
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Sourceright repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Sourceright

Sourceright is Rust-first reference triage and verification infrastructure for academic writing, agent workflows, and future legal citation work. It is currently a technical preview suitable for developer evaluation and pilot conversations.

Who This Is For

  • Technical editors and research-integrity teams that need auditable reference cleanup.
  • Library, repository, and publisher teams that want deterministic citation verification workflows.
  • Developers and agent workflows that need CSL-centered bibliographic pipelines with sidecar evidence.
  • Legal-tech researchers evaluating a separate legal citation path without conflating it with academic CSL.

What It Does / Does Not Do

Sourceright takes references from documents or text, produces canonical CSL JSON, standardises and cleans the records, collects provider evidence, routes uncertain records to manual review, and exports clean reference files for tools such as EndNote, Zotero, and BibLaTeX.

It does not claim to be a production-ready institutional product, a court filing compliance system, or a substitute for examiner-grade final verification. DOCX manuscripts are now parsed directly for citation intake, but broader PDF extraction, live core-provider checks, better citation disambiguation, URL/archive integrity, and low-noise writeback suggestions remain hardening tracks.

Workflow

document/text
  -> extracted references and in-text citations
  -> references.csl.json
  -> standardisation, cleaning, verification, enrichment
  -> references.verification.json and review-queue.jsonl
  -> conflict resolution, citation reconciliation, and reference integrity reports
  -> XML, ENW, RIS, BibLaTeX, and YAML exports

Roadmap

  • Academic reference extraction and CSL JSON canonicalisation.
  • Provider-backed verification through Crossref first, then DOI resolution, DataCite, OpenAlex, PubMed/NCBI, and ORCID where useful.
  • In-text citation reconciliation against reference-list entries.
  • Manual review queues designed for human and agent/subagent verification.
  • Platform-neutral journal screening outputs for editorial workflows, with OJS as the first public integration target.
  • Reference reports for citation integrity auditing and AI-related citation-error signals.
  • CLI and MCP server interfaces over the same Rust core.
  • Legal citation analysis with a separate legal citation model and public-provider slots.
  • Claim/source/provenance graphs built over detected citation support without asserting claim truth.
  • Examiner-grade audit hardening for broader PDF extraction, live provider evidence, institutional-author matching, URL/archive checks, and explicit writeback plans.

See conductor/tracks.md for the implementation track map. The canonical requirements and repo contract are in docs/src/feature-contract-matrix.md, with the design diagrams in docs/src/design.md.

The current quality and security contract is documented in docs/src/security-and-quality-gates.md. Use the repository's bounded local gate runner before opening a change:

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Sourceright: common questions

Is Sourceright MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (88/100). Read the Sourceright safety report
How do I install Sourceright?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Sourceright need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Sourceright maintained?
The last commit was 47 days ago (2026-09-18). The latest release is v0.1.20.
How does Sourceright compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 88/100 (higher than 75% of 48,255 servers); github stars 1 (more than 65% of 28,688 servers). Full comparison.

More from edithatogo →