MCP.Market

Letterbox MCP server

by dovahkiin-v·io.github.dovahkiin-v/letterbox·v1.2.2

File-based comms protocol for AI-to-AI dialogue between terminal agents.

A88/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A88/100

full report

Adoption
New

0 stars18 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Letterbox yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Letterbox tools (6, 1 write)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • acknowledge

    Advance this endpoint's read marker to clear a message from its inbox.

  • channel_info

    Report the agent's letterbox situation — the bridge-state oracle.

  • check_latest_message

    Return the single most recent unread peer message, or null if none.

  • check_messages

    Return up to `limit` unread peer messages, oldest unread first.

  • list_channels

    Enumerate all channels (registered and auto-created) with last activity.

  • send_messagewrite action

    Write a message to the current channel and confirm the send.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-31 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan22 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 67 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 88/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Letterbox compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
88/100
higher than 75% of 48,255 servers
Tools
6
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
17%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Downloads a week
18
more than 5% of 12,191 servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 5 read · 1 send or post

Install Letterbox in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add letterbox -- uvx letterbox
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Letterbox repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Letterbox

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.dovahkiin-v/letterbox --> <!-- ^ MCP Registry ownership proof (ADR-071). The registry reads this from the PyPI longdescription, so it must survive into the published package and must byte-match name in server.json. tests/testregistry_meta.py locks the pair. -->

📌 Built for internal production use. Architecture proven across months of daily AI development. Open-sourced as a reference implementation. I use it almost daily.

If you use AI coding assistants in the terminal, you normally work with one at a time — and getting two of them to collaborate means copy-pasting messages between windows yourself. Letterbox lets two assistants (say, Claude and Gemini, or Gemini and Mistral's Vibe) talk directly to each other and work a task together, hands-free.

The result: one agent can plan while another reviews, or the two can split the work between them — collaborating on their own while you watch, instead of relaying every message by hand.

A small file-based comms protocol that lets two AI agents in separate terminals talk to each other in real time.

Letterbox lets two terminal coding agents — Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Antigravity, or Mistral's Vibe — hold a real-time conversation by passing message files through a shared directory. When one agent speaks, a 📬 notification is injected into the other's terminal and wakes it to read and reply. No network, no server, no shared memory: just JSON files in a folder and the OS's atomic-rename. It's the messaging layer that was built for an internal planning loop, extracted into a standalone, versioned tool in 2026. If you've ever wanted two CLI agents to collaborate on a task without you copy-pasting between windows, this is for you. It gets the occasional update at the author's whim (the launcher tells you when a newer one is out) — but it's currently unsupported small project, not a community one.

The bridge is cross-harness: Claude on one side, Gemini on the other, talking through the same channel, has been verified live. The one wrinkle is setup — Claude wires itself automatically, while Gemini and Antigravity load letterbox from their own settings. The Setup section walks through both.

Why it exists

I work with two AI collaborators every day — Claude and Gemini — each living in whatever terminal harness it runs in (Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Antigravity CLI, and now Mistral's Vibe). Letterbox is how I get them talking to each other instead of through me.

That happens in two modes. Sometimes it's manual: we're brainstorming and I want to loop the other model into the conversation. Sometimes it's automated — in the planning loop, Claude drafts a plan and each plan is routed to Gemini for review as a built-in stage. Letterbox carries both the same way.

It's harness-agnostic by design — Claude Code ↔ Gemini CLI ↔ Antigravity CLI ↔ Vibe in any combination — and same-model pairs work just as well: two Claude tabs, or two Gemini tabs, talking over one channel.

What it is

Each letterbox launch runs two coordinated processes inside one terminal:

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Letterbox: common questions

Is Letterbox MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (88/100). Read the Letterbox safety report
How do I install Letterbox?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Letterbox need an API key?
No secret keys are declared. It reads 3 settings from the environment.
Is Letterbox maintained?
The last commit was 71 days ago (2026-08-25). The latest release is v1.2.2.
What can I use instead of Letterbox?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Desktop Commander MCP server.
How does Letterbox compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 88/100 (higher than 75% of 48,255 servers); tools 6 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 17% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Letterbox

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Desktop Commander
    MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management
    C