Voyager Net MCP server
A safe, read-only, authorized audit of one host you own: DNS, ports, TLS, HTTP hygiene.
0 stars58 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Voyager Net yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Voyager Net tools (1)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postsRead from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.
scan_hostRead-only, AUTHORIZED introspection of ONE host or domain you own: DNS records + email/CA hygiene, open ports, TLS certificate posture, and HTTP security headers → findings with DESCRIBED (never applied) fixes. FAIL-CLOSED: requires authorized:true (you assert ownership/permission). Refuses CIDR ranges, lists, URLs, and cloud metadata endpoints. Never exploits, floods, or mutates. isError:true mea
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-25 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- Code scan48 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 67 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
How Voyager Net compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 85/100
- higher than 70% of 48,255 servers
- Tools
- 1
- the typical server has 7
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Downloads a week
- 58
- more than 48% of 12,191 servers with a package
What its tools let an agent do: 1 read
Install Voyager Net in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
Runs npx -y @dir-ai/voyager-net on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.
claude mcp add voyager-net -- npx -y @dir-ai/voyager-net
What the publisher says
From the Voyager Net repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
voyager-net
Voyager's network organ — a safe, read-only, authorized audit of one host or domain you own, so an AI agent can find the falle in your infra and describe the fix.
Voyager penetrates the web (@dir-ai/voyager), the repo (@dir-ai/voyager-repo), and — here — networks. This is the sense: it finds problems. Applying fixes ("the hands") is a separate, consent-gated organ, by design — an AI must never mutate live infrastructure on its own.
voyager-net scan yourhost.example.com --authorized
voyager-net scan 10.0.5.20 --authorized --ports 22,80,443,5432What it checks (read-only)
resolved a single time and the DNS, port, TLS and HTTP probes are all pinned to that one IP via a custom socket lookup, so nothing re-resolves the name mid-scan (closes the HTTP DNS-rebinding path). The resolved IP is classified canonically (via ipaddr.js) and any non-public address — loopback, private, link-local, CGNAT, NAT64, IPv4-mapped IPv6, metadata — is refused.
- Resolve-once + IP pinning (every probe, HTTP included) — a domain is
SPF +all (anyone may send) and DMARC p=none (no enforcement) are findings, not just presence checks. All target-controlled records are injection-framed.
- DNS — A/AAAA/MX/TXT/CAA + email/CA hygiene, and it grades the content:
states (open / closed / filtered / unreachable — an OS timeout reads as filtered*, not closed), no SYN tricks, no payloads, no range/CIDR sweeps.
- Ports — a bounded common-service probe by plain TCP connect() with **real
(SSH, SMTP, FTP, POP3, IMAP) to identify product + version (framed).
- Service fingerprinting — reads the banner a service volunteers on connect
Memcached, Elasticsearch, CouchDB, Docker API, ZooKeeper) it sends ONE benign, read-only protocol hello (e.g. Redis PING) and reports the service as exposed only if it answers without asking for credentials. Honest scope: this and the TLS/HTTP inspectors DO send bytes (a ClientHello, a GET /, a protocol hello) — the audit is active-but-safe (no writes, no mutation, no exploit), not purely passive, and it runs only against the host you authorized.
- Unauthenticated-service detection — for auth-expecting services (Redis,
negotiated one), chain trust against the system store (any validation failure is reported, not only self-signed), RSA key size (EC/EdDSA exempted), certificate expiry/issuer.
- TLS — the full set of accepted protocol versions (not just the
max-age, unsafe-inline/wildcard — not just presence), clickjacking protection, per-cookie Secure/HttpOnly (each cookie evaluated on its own), CORS wildcard and the dangerous credentials-with-origin case, version-leak, and HTTP→HTTPS redirect. All pinned to the vetted IP.
- HTTP hygiene (graded) — status, Server banner, HSTS/CSP quality (weak
reported as UNKNOWN, never folded into a "no issues" verdict.
- Honest partial — an open TLS/HTTP port that couldn't be inspected is
Findings that name a detected service+version suggest checking it against a CVE feed — voyager-net detects the version; CVE matching stays a lookup, and CVE probing (Nuclei &c.) is out of scope — that is active testing, a separate, more-gated capability, not a read-only sense.
Each finding carries a severity, confidence, and a described fix — e.g. "certificate expires in 6d → renew and automate ACME", "mysql reachable publicly → restrict to a private network", "no DMARC → publish v=DMARC1; p=quarantine".
Safety — non-negotiable
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Voyager Net: common questions
- Is Voyager Net MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (85/100). Read the Voyager Net safety report
- How do I install Voyager Net?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does Voyager Net need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Voyager Net maintained?
- The last commit was 107 days ago (2026-07-20). The latest release is v0.14.0.
- What can I use instead of Voyager Net?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: SSH — policy-gated remote access MCP server and Domain Liveness MCP server.
- How does Voyager Net compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 85/100 (higher than 70% of 48,255 servers); tools 1 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.
Alternatives to Voyager Net
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- SSH — policy-gated remote accessPolicy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.not reviewedEstablishedB
- Domain LivenessIs this business's website still there? Checks apex and www, and DNS separately from HTTP.not reviewedEstablishedA