Tariffmonitor MCP server
online · 100% uptimeUS import tariffs: HTS lookup, stacked rate (MFN+301+232 by line+forced-labor), compare origins.
not scanned yet
0 stars37 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Tariffmonitor yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Tariffmonitor tools
Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.
How Tariffmonitor compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 92/100
- higher than 93% of 48,243 servers
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
- Response time
- 192 ms
- faster than 68% of 30,027 servers
- Downloads a week
- 37
- more than 26% of 12,306 servers with a package
Release history: 9 versions in the registry since 2026-05-22, latest 2026-11-03, typically one every 1 day.
Install Tariffmonitor in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add --transport http tariffmonitor-mcp https://adcreator-ai.com/mcp-free
What the publisher says
From the Tariffmonitor repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
tariffmonitor-mcp
MCP server for the Tariff Exposure Monitor — a live US import tariff calculator covering 19,856 HTS codes.
Give Claude (or any MCP-compatible AI) the ability to look up real stacked tariff rates and project the November 10, 2026 cliff impact on any product.
What it does
Two tools:
Example exchange — a real capture from the live API on 2026-09-11, not a mock-up:
You: What's the tariff on athletic footwear from China, and what does it cost me at $800k/year?
Claude: [calls lookup_hts_code query="athletic footwear", then calculate_tariff
hts_code="6404110000", origin_country="CN", annual_import_value_usd=800000]
Note: 6404110000 is not in the schedule. This rate is for heading 640411, resolved to 6404112030.
HTS 6404112030 - For men
Origin: CN
Rate stack:
MFN base rate: +0.00%
Section 301 (China trade enforcement): +7.50%
Total current rate: 7.50%
No cliff change projected for this code/country combination.
Dollar impact at $800,000/yr import value:
Current annual duties: $60,000Rates change, and a rate is per HTS code and origin country - treat the numbers above as the shape of the answer, not as a quote for your shipment. The tool never invents a rate: if the upstream is unreachable or the code is not in the schedule, it says so instead of estimating.
Install (Claude Desktop)
Add to your claudedesktopconfig.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"tariffmonitor": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "tariffmonitor-mcp"]
}
}
}Restart Claude Desktop. The lookuphtscode and calculate_tariff tools appear automatically.
Install (Cursor / other MCP clients)
{
"mcp": {
"servers": {
"tariffmonitor": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "tariffmonitor-mcp"]
}
}
}
}No API key required
The tool calls the free public API at adcreator-ai.com. No signup, no rate limits for reasonable use.
Related
- Free tariff calculator — browser version
- Official US Harmonized Tariff Schedule — the authoritative rates
Built by Dale Weaver / 0xpi.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Tariffmonitor: common questions
- Is Tariffmonitor MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (92/100). Read the Tariffmonitor safety report
- How do I install Tariffmonitor?
- It runs remotely at adcreator-ai.com. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
- Does Tariffmonitor need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Tariffmonitor maintained?
- The last commit was 24 days ago (2026-10-12). The latest release is v1.4.4.
- Is Tariffmonitor up?
- 100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
- How does Tariffmonitor compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 92/100 (higher than 93% of 48,243 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 192 ms (faster than 68% of 30,027 servers). Full comparison.