MCP.Market

Evidence Gate MCP server

by Dailyaiagents·io.github.Dailyaiagents/evidence-gate·v0.1.1

Local checks for artifacts, declared claim evidence, and citation containment.

A91/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A91/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

0 stars26 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Evidence Gate yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Evidence Gate tools (4)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • audit_citations

    Check whether quoted text is literally contained in a rooted local source.

  • audit_claims

    Check whether claims declare available local evidence; URLs remain unverified.

  • summarize_verification

    Aggregate evidence receipts without upgrading uncertain states.

  • verify_artifact

    Check that one rooted artifact exists, is non-empty, and obeys declared text rules.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-30 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan5 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 7 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Overall 91/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Evidence Gate compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
91/100
higher than 85% of 48,243 servers
Tools
4
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Downloads a week
26
more than 13% of 12,306 servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 4 read

Install Evidence Gate in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add evidence-gate -- uvx dailyaiagents-evidence-gate
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Evidence Gate repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Daily AI Agent Toolkit

Local, deterministic tools for checking AI-generated work before it is released.

The toolkit contains two Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and six portable Agent Skills. They inspect retained artifacts, declared claim support, literal citations, completion contracts, blockers, and release receipts without calling a model, uploading files, or requiring a Daily AI Agents account.

Release status: 0.1.1 patch release candidate. PyPI 0.1.0 is public; the patch corrects the case-sensitive MCP Registry ownership marker.

Why this exists

AI systems can produce convincing output without proving that required artifacts exist, cited text is present, or a completion contract was actually satisfied. These tools make those narrow checks repeatable and preserve uncertainty instead of silently upgrading it to success.

They deliberately do not determine broad truth, judge semantic entailment, approve a release, validate a live service, or establish legal or security compliance.

Included tools

Evidence Gate

  • verify_artifact
  • audit_claims
  • audit_citations
  • summarize_verification

Release Gate

  • check_contract
  • evaluate_completion
  • format_blockers
  • buildreleasereceipt

Agent Skills

  • artifact-verifier
  • claim-truth-gate
  • completion-contract
  • contract-checker
  • fail-loud
  • verification-bench

Install and run

Python 3.11 or newer is required.

python -m pip install dailyaiagents-evidence-gate==0.1.1
python -m pip install dailyaiagents-release-gate==0.1.1

dailyai-evidence-gate --root /absolute/path/to/workspace
dailyai-release-gate --root /absolute/path/to/workspace

Until the packages are public, install from a clean checkout:

python -m pip install ./servers/evidence-gate ./servers/release-gate

Both servers use MCP stdio transport. A representative client configuration is:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dailyai-evidence-gate": {
      "command": "dailyai-evidence-gate",
      "args": ["--root", "/absolute/path/to/workspace"]
    },
    "dailyai-release-gate": {
      "command": "dailyai-release-gate",
      "args": ["--root", "/absolute/path/to/workspace"]
    }
  }
}

See client configuration for the supported transport boundary.

Reproduce the proof

Run the complete local gate:

bash scripts/test-all.sh

The release candidate includes:

  • unit tests for both servers;
  • deterministic self-tests for all six skills;
  • 20 declared-outcome examples spanning all eight MCP tools;
  • rooted-path and symlink-escape protections;
  • clean-wheel installation and stdio tool-discovery checks;
  • package-specific checksums, SBOMs, and build provenance.

See the examples, technical report, receipt schemas, release and recovery process, and local verification record. A passing local check proves only the condition and scope named in its receipt.

Architecture and security boundary

Live repository controls and current fail-closed publication gates are recorded in Repository controls.

MCP client
   |  stdio + structured inputs
   v
Evidence Gate / Release Gate
   |  canonical path resolution beneath --root
   v
Local retained files  --->  structured status + scoped receipt

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Evidence Gate: common questions

Is Evidence Gate MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (91/100). Read the Evidence Gate safety report
How do I install Evidence Gate?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Evidence Gate need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Evidence Gate maintained?
The last commit was 13 days ago (2026-10-23). The latest release is v0.1.1.
How does Evidence Gate compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 91/100 (higher than 85% of 48,243 servers); tools 4 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.