LLM Compliance Comparison MCP server

by CSOAI-ORG·io.github.CSOAI-ORG/llm-compliance-comparison-mcp·v1.0.13

Llm Compliance Comparison MCP Server by MEOK AI Labs

A89/100grade A

What users say

No reviews yet

Safety scan

A89/100

Adoption

Growing

0 stars30 downloads/wk

Reviews

Nobody has reviewed LLM Compliance Comparison yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

compare_providers
Compare LLM providers (Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Llama, Mistral) against governance standards. Score providers on transparency, safety, data governance, and accountability.
compliance_matrix
Generate a compliance matrix showing all providers against all frameworks. Shows coverage status per provider per framework with rationale.
crosswalk_providers
Map LLM provider safety policies to CSOAI Partnership Charter articles. Shows how each provider's governance aligns with CSOAI's 52-article framework.
provider_risk_profile
Generate a detailed risk profile for a specific LLM provider. Covers vendor risk, data handling, regulatory compliance, operational risks, and AI-specific risks.
recommend_for_use_case
Given a use case and jurisdiction, recommend the most compliant LLM provider. Considers regulatory requirements, data residency, safety needs, and deployment constraints.

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-11-03 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings

Code scan19 source files scanned25/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 26 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10

Overall 89/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 89/100; higher than 83% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
Tools: 5; the typical AI and agents server has 6
Tools that change things: 0%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Downloads a week: 30; more than 17% of 1,538 AI and agents servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 5 read

claude mcp add llm-compliance-comparison-mcp -- uvx llm-compliance-comparison-mcp

Is LLM Compliance Comparison MCP server safe?: Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (89/100). Read the LLM Compliance Comparison safety report
How do I install LLM Compliance Comparison?: It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does LLM Compliance Comparison need an API key?: Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is LLM Compliance Comparison maintained?: The last commit was 27 days ago (2026-10-08). The latest release is v1.0.13.
How does LLM Compliance Comparison compare with other AI and agents MCP servers?: safety score 89/100 (higher than 83% of 4,460 AI and agents servers); tools 5 (the typical AI and agents server has 6); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.