MCP.Market

Transbank MCP server

by codespar·io.github.codespar/mcp-transbank·v0.2.0-alpha.3·271 stars
No reviews yet

MCP server for Transbank — Chile dominant card acquirer (Webpay Plus / Mall / OneClick)

B82/100grade B
Write a reviewInstall
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B82/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

271 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Transbank yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Transbank tools (19, 9 write)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • oneclick_authorizewrite action

    Charge a stored OneClick Mall card across one or more mall merchant codes. Each details entry is a separate child charge with its own commerce_code, buy_order, amount, and installments_number.

  • oneclick_capture

    Capture a previously authorized OneClick Mall charge (deferred-capture flow). One capture per child detail.

  • oneclick_create_inscriptionwrite action

    Start a OneClick Mall card-enrollment flow. Returns { token, url_webpay } — redirect the user to complete enrollment. After return to response_url, call oneclick_finish_inscription.

  • oneclick_delete_inscriptionwrite action

    Delete (revoke) a stored OneClick Mall card for a user.

  • oneclick_finish_inscription

    Finalize a OneClick Mall enrollment after the user has returned. Returns the tbk_user token to store and reuse in oneclick_authorize.

  • oneclick_get_transaction_by_buy_orderwrite action

    Look up a OneClick Mall transaction by parent buy_order. Functionally identical to oneclick_status — provided as an explicit name for agents that follow the 'get by identifier' naming convention.

  • oneclick_refundwrite action

    Refund a OneClick Mall charge. Parent buy_order identifies the mall transaction; detail_buy_order + commerce_code pinpoint the child to refund.

  • oneclick_status

    Get the status of a OneClick Mall transaction by parent buy_order.

  • webpay_capture_transaction

    Deferred-capture for a previously authorized Webpay Plus transaction. Uses the official PUT /capture endpoint — prefer this over webpay_increase_amount for standard deferred-capture flows.

  • webpay_commit_transaction

    Commit a Webpay Plus transaction after the user has returned from the Webpay flow. Must be called to actually charge the card.

  • webpay_create_transactionwrite action

    Create a Webpay Plus transaction. Returns { token, url } — redirect the user to url?token_ws=<token> to complete payment. After the user returns to return_url, call webpay_commit_transaction.

  • webpay_get_transaction_status

    Get the current status of a Webpay Plus transaction by token.

  • webpay_increase_amount

    Capture a previously authorized Webpay Plus transaction (partial-capture / deferred-capture flow).

  • webpay_mall_capture_transaction

    Deferred-capture for one child seller inside a Webpay Mall transaction.

  • webpay_mall_commit_transaction

    Commit a Webpay Mall transaction after the user has returned. Charges all child commerce codes at once.

  • webpay_mall_create_transactionwrite action

    Create a Webpay Mall transaction — one parent buy_order split across several seller commerce codes. Returns { token, url } exactly like Webpay Plus. Each details entry is a child charge with its own commerce_code, buy_order, and amount.

  • webpay_mall_get_transaction_status

    Get the status of a Webpay Mall transaction by token (includes per-child details).

  • webpay_mall_refund_transactionwrite action

    Refund one child seller of a Webpay Mall transaction. Must specify which child (commerce_code + buy_order) to refund.

  • webpay_refund_transactionwrite action

    Refund a committed Webpay Plus transaction. Full refund if amount equals original; partial otherwise.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan5 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
  • Maintenancelast push 29 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Transbank compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
82/100
higher than 63% of 48,255 servers
Tools
19
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
47%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
GitHub stars
271
more than 95% of 28,688 servers

What its tools let an agent do: 10 read · 9 change

Install Transbank in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

Runs npx -y @codespar/mcp-transbank on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.

claude mcp add mcp-transbank -- npx -y @codespar/mcp-transbank
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Transbank repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

MCP Dev LATAM 🌎 Every commerce API your AI agent needs to run a business in Latin America. Brazil 🇧🇷 · Mexico 🇲🇽 · Argentina 🇦🇷 · Colombia 🇨🇴 · Chile 🇨🇱 · Peru 🇵🇪 · plus 4 agentic payment protocols. MCP servers for LATAM commerce · live in the official MCP Registry · MIT License Machine-readable catalog: codespar.dev/api/servers Catalog · Quick Start · Agentic Protocols · All Servers · Contribute

The Problem

AI agents can write code, analyze data, and chat. But they can't operate a business — collect payments, issue invoices, ship products, or notify customers. Especially not in Latin America, where every service has its own API, auth pattern, and quirks (mTLS for BACEN Pix v2, JWT-RSA for STP-SPEI, AFIP web services, contract-gated developer portals, and on).

Meanwhile, four agentic payment protocols are shipping in parallel — checkout protocols (Stripe ACP, Google UCP), authorization layers (AP2), and micropayment rails (x402) — and none of them compose cleanly with each other or with the regional rails businesses actually run on.

MCP Dev LATAM bridges both gaps. Traditional LATAM services + the new agentic payment protocols, all accessible through a single MCP interface.

The Solution

Each MCP server in this repo wraps a real provider — payments, fiscal, logistics, messaging, banking, ERP, identity, fraud, crypto, and the agentic protocols — so your agent can operate a complete business workflow.

🛒 Customer places order
  → 💳 Agent charges via Pix (Asaas / Mercado Pago / Zoop)
  → 📄 Agent issues NFe (Nuvem Fiscal / Focus NFe / NFe.io)
  → 📦 Agent generates shipping label (Melhor Envio / Skydropx)
  → 📱 Agent sends tracking via WhatsApp (Z-API / WhatsApp Cloud)
  → 📊 Agent records in ERP (Omie / Bling / Tiny)
  → 🏦 Agent reconciles balance (Stark Bank / Itaú / BTG)

Six systems. Zero human intervention. One agent.

Agentic Payment Protocols

Four servers for the emerging agentic payment stack:

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Transbank: common questions

Is Transbank MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (82/100). Read the Transbank safety report
How do I install Transbank?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Transbank need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for TRANSBANK_API_KEY_SECRET.
Is Transbank maintained?
The last commit was 67 days ago (2026-08-29). The latest release is v0.2.0-alpha.3.
How does Transbank compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 82/100 (higher than 63% of 48,255 servers); tools 19 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 47% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

More from codespar →