MCP.Market

Stone MCP server

by codespar·io.github.codespar/mcp-stone·v0.2.2·271 stars

MCP server for Stone — open banking, payments, Pix, transfers

B82/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B82/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

271 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Stone yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Stone tools (21, 9 write)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • cancel_transactionwrite action

    Cancel an authorized (not-yet-captured) transaction

  • create_anticipationwrite action

    Anticipate future receivables (Stone's flagship 'antecipação')

  • create_boletowrite action

    Create a boleto bancário for charging a customer

  • create_card_chargewrite action

    Charge a credit or debit card (Stone acquiring)

  • create_paymentwrite action

    Create a payment via Stone

  • create_pix_chargewrite action

    Create a Pix charge (QR Code / cob) to receive a payment

  • create_pix_paymentwrite action

    Create a Pix payment (outbound) via Stone

  • create_transferwrite action

    Create a bank transfer (internal or external)

  • get_anticipation_limits

    Get current anticipation limits (max / min / available) for a merchant

  • get_balance

    Get account balance

  • get_payment

    Get payment details by ID

  • get_statement

    Get account statement for a period

  • get_terminal_status

    Get current status of a specific POS terminal (online / offline / last seen)

  • list_payments

    List payments with optional filters

  • list_receivables

    Search receivables (future credits from card transactions)

  • list_terminals

    List physical Stone / TON terminals for a merchant

  • list_transactions

    List account transactions

  • list_webhooks

    List registered webhook endpoints

  • refund_transactionwrite action

    Refund a settled transaction (full or partial)

  • register_webhook

    Register a webhook endpoint for Stone events

  • tokenize_card

    Tokenize a card to PCI-safe token for later charging

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan5 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
  • Maintenancelast push 29 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Stone compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
82/100
higher than 63% of 48,255 servers
Tools
21
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
43%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
GitHub stars
271
more than 95% of 28,688 servers

What its tools let an agent do: 11 read · 8 create · 1 change · 1 delete

Install Stone in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

Runs npx -y @codespar/mcp-stone on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.

claude mcp add mcp-stone -- npx -y @codespar/mcp-stone
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Stone repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

MCP Dev LATAM 🌎 Every commerce API your AI agent needs to run a business in Latin America. Brazil 🇧🇷 · Mexico 🇲🇽 · Argentina 🇦🇷 · Colombia 🇨🇴 · Chile 🇨🇱 · Peru 🇵🇪 · plus 4 agentic payment protocols. MCP servers for LATAM commerce · live in the official MCP Registry · MIT License Machine-readable catalog: codespar.dev/api/servers Catalog · Quick Start · Agentic Protocols · All Servers · Contribute

The Problem

AI agents can write code, analyze data, and chat. But they can't operate a business — collect payments, issue invoices, ship products, or notify customers. Especially not in Latin America, where every service has its own API, auth pattern, and quirks (mTLS for BACEN Pix v2, JWT-RSA for STP-SPEI, AFIP web services, contract-gated developer portals, and on).

Meanwhile, four agentic payment protocols are shipping in parallel — checkout protocols (Stripe ACP, Google UCP), authorization layers (AP2), and micropayment rails (x402) — and none of them compose cleanly with each other or with the regional rails businesses actually run on.

MCP Dev LATAM bridges both gaps. Traditional LATAM services + the new agentic payment protocols, all accessible through a single MCP interface.

The Solution

Each MCP server in this repo wraps a real provider — payments, fiscal, logistics, messaging, banking, ERP, identity, fraud, crypto, and the agentic protocols — so your agent can operate a complete business workflow.

🛒 Customer places order
  → 💳 Agent charges via Pix (Asaas / Mercado Pago / Zoop)
  → 📄 Agent issues NFe (Nuvem Fiscal / Focus NFe / NFe.io)
  → 📦 Agent generates shipping label (Melhor Envio / Skydropx)
  → 📱 Agent sends tracking via WhatsApp (Z-API / WhatsApp Cloud)
  → 📊 Agent records in ERP (Omie / Bling / Tiny)
  → 🏦 Agent reconciles balance (Stark Bank / Itaú / BTG)

Six systems. Zero human intervention. One agent.

Agentic Payment Protocols

Four servers for the emerging agentic payment stack:

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Stone: common questions

Is Stone MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (82/100). Read the Stone safety report
How do I install Stone?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Stone need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for STONE_CLIENT_SECRET.
Is Stone maintained?
The last commit was 67 days ago (2026-08-29). The latest release is v0.2.2.
How does Stone compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 82/100 (higher than 63% of 48,255 servers); tools 21 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 43% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

More from codespar →