Sicoob MCP server
MCP server for Sicoob — Pix (cob/cobv/DICT), Cobrança (boleto), SPB (OAuth2 + mTLS)
271 stars23 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Sicoob yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Sicoob tools (13, 5 write)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postsRead from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.
cancel_boletowrite actionCancel (baixa) an outstanding boleto before payment.
create_boletowrite actionIssue a boleto via Sicoob Cobrança. Returns nosso_numero, linha_digitável, barcode, and PDF URL.
create_pix_cobwrite actionCreate an immediate Pix charge (cob) with QR code. Returns the txid, copy-paste EMV payload, and location URL.
create_pix_cobvwrite actionCreate a Pix charge with due date (cobv) — boleto-like Pix payable on or after a due date with optional fine/interest/discount. Returns txid, copy-paste EMV payload, and location URL.
delete_dict_keywrite actionDelete a DICT key owned by the cooperative member. Irreversible — the key becomes available for re-registration by any PSP after BCB lockout window.
get_account_balanceQuery the merchant cooperative account balance via Sicoob SPB. Returns available, blocked, and overdraft (limite) figures.
get_boletoRetrieve a boleto by its Sicoob identifier (id or nosso_numero).
get_oauth_tokenMint or return a cached OAuth2 client_credentials bearer token for the Sicoob Developers Portal. Exposed so agents can inspect token freshness; normal tool calls obtain tokens implicitly.
get_pix_cobRetrieve an immediate Pix charge by its txid.
get_pix_cobvRetrieve a due-date Pix charge (cobv) by its txid.
list_pix_cobList immediate Pix charges (cob) registered by the merchant within a date range. Paginated per BACEN Pix v2.
lookup_dict_keyResolve a DICT key (CPF, CNPJ, email, phone, EVP) to the owner's account data before sending a Pix. Subject to BCB rate limits per consenting payer.
register_dict_keyRegister a DICT key (CPF, CNPJ, email, phone, or EVP) on a Sicoob account owned by the cooperative member. Subject to BCB validation flows (e.g. email/SMS confirmation for email/phone keys).
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- Code scan5 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
- Maintenancelast push 29 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
How Sicoob compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 82/100
- higher than 63% of 48,255 servers
- Tools
- 13
- the typical server has 7
- Tools that change things
- 38%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- GitHub stars
- 271
- more than 95% of 28,688 servers
- Downloads a week
- 23
- more than 9% of 12,191 servers with a package
What its tools let an agent do: 7 read · 4 create · 2 delete
Install Sicoob in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
Runs npx -y @codespar/mcp-sicoob on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.
claude mcp add mcp-sicoob -- npx -y @codespar/mcp-sicoob
What the publisher says
From the Sicoob repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
MCP Dev LATAM 🌎 Every commerce API your AI agent needs to run a business in Latin America. Brazil 🇧🇷 · Mexico 🇲🇽 · Argentina 🇦🇷 · Colombia 🇨🇴 · Chile 🇨🇱 · Peru 🇵🇪 · plus 4 agentic payment protocols. MCP servers for LATAM commerce · live in the official MCP Registry · MIT License Machine-readable catalog: codespar.dev/api/servers Catalog · Quick Start · Agentic Protocols · All Servers · Contribute
The Problem
AI agents can write code, analyze data, and chat. But they can't operate a business — collect payments, issue invoices, ship products, or notify customers. Especially not in Latin America, where every service has its own API, auth pattern, and quirks (mTLS for BACEN Pix v2, JWT-RSA for STP-SPEI, AFIP web services, contract-gated developer portals, and on).
Meanwhile, four agentic payment protocols are shipping in parallel — checkout protocols (Stripe ACP, Google UCP), authorization layers (AP2), and micropayment rails (x402) — and none of them compose cleanly with each other or with the regional rails businesses actually run on.
MCP Dev LATAM bridges both gaps. Traditional LATAM services + the new agentic payment protocols, all accessible through a single MCP interface.
The Solution
Each MCP server in this repo wraps a real provider — payments, fiscal, logistics, messaging, banking, ERP, identity, fraud, crypto, and the agentic protocols — so your agent can operate a complete business workflow.
🛒 Customer places order
→ 💳 Agent charges via Pix (Asaas / Mercado Pago / Zoop)
→ 📄 Agent issues NFe (Nuvem Fiscal / Focus NFe / NFe.io)
→ 📦 Agent generates shipping label (Melhor Envio / Skydropx)
→ 📱 Agent sends tracking via WhatsApp (Z-API / WhatsApp Cloud)
→ 📊 Agent records in ERP (Omie / Bling / Tiny)
→ 🏦 Agent reconciles balance (Stark Bank / Itaú / BTG)Six systems. Zero human intervention. One agent.
Agentic Payment Protocols
Four servers for the emerging agentic payment stack:
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Sicoob: common questions
- Is Sicoob MCP server safe?
- Mostly: it is graded B (82/100). Read the Sicoob safety report
- How do I install Sicoob?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does Sicoob need an API key?
- Yes. The registry entry asks for
SICOOB_CLIENT_SECRET,SICOOB_KEY_PATH. - Is Sicoob maintained?
- The last commit was 67 days ago (2026-08-29). The latest release is v0.1.0-alpha.4.
- How does Sicoob compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 82/100 (higher than 63% of 48,255 servers); tools 13 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 38% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.