MCP.Market

Focus Nfe MCP server

by codespar·io.github.codespar/mcp-focus-nfe·v0.2.2·271 stars

MCP server for Focus NFe — NFe, NFSe, NFCe emission and management

B82/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B82/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

271 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Focus Nfe yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Focus Nfe tools (19, 11 write)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • cancel_ctewrite action

    Cancel an authorized CTe

  • cancel_nfcewrite action

    Cancel an authorized NFCe

  • cancel_nfewrite action

    Cancel an authorized NFe (within 24h of emission)

  • cancel_nfsewrite action

    Cancel an authorized NFSe

  • close_mdfe

    Close/finalize an MDFe (encerramento) after trip completion

  • create_ctewrite action

    Create and emit a CTe (conhecimento de transporte eletronico) for cargo transport

  • create_mdfewrite action

    Create and emit an MDFe (manifesto eletronico de documentos fiscais) for cargo transport manifest

  • create_nfcewrite action

    Create and emit an NFCe (nota fiscal do consumidor eletronica)

  • create_nfewrite action

    Create and emit an NFe (nota fiscal eletronica)

  • create_nfsewrite action

    Create and emit an NFSe (nota fiscal de servico)

  • delete_webhookwrite action

    Delete a registered webhook by ID

  • get_cte

    Get CTe details and status by reference

  • get_nfce

    Get NFCe details and status by reference

  • get_nfe

    Get NFe details and status by reference

  • get_nfe_pdf

    Get NFe PDF (DANFE) download URL

  • get_nfse

    Get NFSe details and status by reference

  • list_webhooks

    List all registered webhooks (gatilhos)

  • register_webhook

    Register a webhook trigger (gatilho) that notifies your URL when fiscal document events occur

  • send_correction_letterwrite action

    Send a correction letter (Carta de Correcao / CCe) for an authorized NFe

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan5 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitystatic API keys via environment variables6/15
  • Maintenancelast push 29 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Focus Nfe compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
82/100
higher than 63% of 48,255 servers
Tools
19
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
58%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
GitHub stars
271
more than 95% of 28,688 servers

What its tools let an agent do: 6 read · 6 create · 1 change · 5 delete · 1 send or post

Install Focus Nfe in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

Runs npx -y @codespar/mcp-focus-nfe on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.

claude mcp add mcp-focus-nfe -- npx -y @codespar/mcp-focus-nfe
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Focus Nfe repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

MCP Dev LATAM 🌎 Every commerce API your AI agent needs to run a business in Latin America. Brazil 🇧🇷 · Mexico 🇲🇽 · Argentina 🇦🇷 · Colombia 🇨🇴 · Chile 🇨🇱 · Peru 🇵🇪 · plus 4 agentic payment protocols. MCP servers for LATAM commerce · live in the official MCP Registry · MIT License Machine-readable catalog: codespar.dev/api/servers Catalog · Quick Start · Agentic Protocols · All Servers · Contribute

The Problem

AI agents can write code, analyze data, and chat. But they can't operate a business — collect payments, issue invoices, ship products, or notify customers. Especially not in Latin America, where every service has its own API, auth pattern, and quirks (mTLS for BACEN Pix v2, JWT-RSA for STP-SPEI, AFIP web services, contract-gated developer portals, and on).

Meanwhile, four agentic payment protocols are shipping in parallel — checkout protocols (Stripe ACP, Google UCP), authorization layers (AP2), and micropayment rails (x402) — and none of them compose cleanly with each other or with the regional rails businesses actually run on.

MCP Dev LATAM bridges both gaps. Traditional LATAM services + the new agentic payment protocols, all accessible through a single MCP interface.

The Solution

Each MCP server in this repo wraps a real provider — payments, fiscal, logistics, messaging, banking, ERP, identity, fraud, crypto, and the agentic protocols — so your agent can operate a complete business workflow.

🛒 Customer places order
  → 💳 Agent charges via Pix (Asaas / Mercado Pago / Zoop)
  → 📄 Agent issues NFe (Nuvem Fiscal / Focus NFe / NFe.io)
  → 📦 Agent generates shipping label (Melhor Envio / Skydropx)
  → 📱 Agent sends tracking via WhatsApp (Z-API / WhatsApp Cloud)
  → 📊 Agent records in ERP (Omie / Bling / Tiny)
  → 🏦 Agent reconciles balance (Stark Bank / Itaú / BTG)

Six systems. Zero human intervention. One agent.

Agentic Payment Protocols

Four servers for the emerging agentic payment stack:

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Focus Nfe: common questions

Is Focus Nfe MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (82/100). Read the Focus Nfe safety report
How do I install Focus Nfe?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Focus Nfe need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for FOCUS_NFE_TOKEN.
Is Focus Nfe maintained?
The last commit was 67 days ago (2026-08-29). The latest release is v0.2.2.
How does Focus Nfe compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 82/100 (higher than 63% of 48,255 servers); tools 19 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 58% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

More from codespar →