MCP.Market

Captapi MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by CDCStream·io.github.CDCStream/captapi·v0.5.1

Public social media data: profiles, posts, comments, transcripts and ad libraries, 30+ platforms.

C68/100grade C
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
C68/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
New

35 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Captapi yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Captapi tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How Captapi compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
68/100
higher than 30% of 48,255 servers
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Response time
131 ms
faster than 77% of 30,031 servers
Downloads a week
35
more than 25% of 12,191 servers with a package

Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-06-27, latest 2026-10-18, typically one every 113 days.

Install Captapi in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http captapi https://api.captapi.com/mcp
Add to Cursor

Captapi: common questions

Is Captapi MCP server safe?
With care: it is graded C, so read the findings first (68/100). Read the Captapi safety report
How do I install Captapi?
It runs remotely at api.captapi.com. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Captapi need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for CAPTAPI_API_KEY, Authorization.
Is Captapi maintained?
The latest release is v0.5.1.
Is Captapi up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
How does Captapi compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 68/100 (higher than 30% of 48,255 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 131 ms (faster than 77% of 30,031 servers). Full comparison.