Website Screenshot & PDF API MCP server
online · 100% uptimeio.github.catalyst-labs-dev/website-screenshot-pdf-api·v1.0.1Full-page screenshots/PDFs, cookie walls removed; blocked or failed pages never charged.
0 stars
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Website Screenshot & PDF API yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Website Screenshot & PDF API tools
Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-25 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
- Live reliabilityremote reachable in 75ms (auth required)20/20
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
- Auth qualityOAuth resource metadata advertised on 40115/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
How Website Screenshot & PDF API compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 95/100
- higher than 97% of 48,255 servers
- Uptime
- 100%
- of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
- Response time
- 24 ms
- faster than 96% of 30,031 servers
Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-10-19, latest 2026-10-25, typically one every 6 days.
Install Website Screenshot & PDF API in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add --transport http website-screenshot-pdf-api https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=catalyst-labs/website-screenshot-pdf-api
What the publisher says
From the Website Screenshot & PDF API repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
Catalyst Labs tools for AI agents (MCP)
Dependable tools for AI agents, built by Catalyst Labs and hosted on Apify. Each tool is a remote MCP server running on Apify's hosted MCP endpoint. There is nothing to install or run. Connect the URL, sign in with Apify (OAuth) or pass an Apify API token, and your agent gets the tool.
This repository contains documentation and MCP listing metadata only. The tools themselves run on Apify.
Website: https://catalyst-labs-dev.github.io/ · Benchmarks (our own tests, Oct 18, 2026): benchmarks/ · Free n8n workflows: catalyst-labs-dev/n8n-templates
Tools
Every tool: structured JSON rows, a published price per use, failed items never charged, and a clear status/errorCode instead of a silent empty result or a guess.
To give one agent all of them, use: https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=catalyst-labs/agent-web-reader,catalyst-labs/document-to-markdown,catalyst-labs/google-trends-api,catalyst-labs/youtube-transcript-api,catalyst-labs/podcast-transcript-api,catalyst-labs/website-screenshot-pdf-api,catalyst-labs/career-site-jobs-scraper,catalyst-labs/city-council-meeting-transcripts,catalyst-labs/local-government-decision-lookup. Example prompts for each tool: examples/agent-prompts.md. Machine-readable index: llms.txt.
Career Site Jobs Scraper
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Website Screenshot & PDF API: common questions
- Is Website Screenshot & PDF API MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (95/100). Read the Website Screenshot & PDF API safety report
- How do I install Website Screenshot & PDF API?
- It runs remotely at mcp.apify.com. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
- Does Website Screenshot & PDF API need an API key?
- No key to paste: it signs you in with OAuth when your client connects.
- Is Website Screenshot & PDF API maintained?
- The last commit was 10 days ago (2026-10-25). The latest release is v1.0.1.
- Is Website Screenshot & PDF API up?
- 100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
- How does Website Screenshot & PDF API compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 95/100 (higher than 97% of 48,255 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 24 ms (faster than 96% of 30,031 servers). Full comparison.