SiteHealth MCP server

by carsonroell-debug·io.github.carsonroell-debug/sitehealth-mcp·v0.1.1

Full website health audit — SSL, DNS, DMARC/SPF/DKIM, performance, uptime, links

B82/100grade B

What users say

No reviews yet

Safety scan

B82/100

Adoption

New

0 stars

Reviews

Nobody has reviewed SiteHealth MCP yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

audit_sitewrite action
Run a comprehensive website health audit — SSL, DNS, DMARC/SPF/DKIM, page performance,
check_dns
Resolve all DNS records (A, AAAA, MX, NS, CNAME, TXT, SOA) and check for
check_email_authwrite action
Validate DMARC, SPF, and DKIM records for a domain. Checks for common misconfigurations,
check_links
Extract links from a page and check each for broken responses (4xx/5xx).
check_performance
Measure TTFB, total load time, page weight, redirect chain, compression, and cache headers.
check_ssl
Check SSL/TLS certificate validity, expiry date, issuer, protocol version, and SANs.
check_uptime
HTTP ping to check if a site is reachable and measure response time.

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings

Code scan17 source files scanned25/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 153 days ago8/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10

Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score: 82/100; higher than 63% of 48,255 servers
Tools: 7; the typical server has 7
Tools that change things: 29%; typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 5 read · 2 change

Runs npx -y sitehealth-mcp on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.

claude mcp add sitehealth-mcp -- npx -y sitehealth-mcp

Is SiteHealth MCP server safe?: Mostly: it is graded B (82/100). Read the SiteHealth MCP safety report
How do I install SiteHealth MCP?: It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does SiteHealth MCP need an API key?: Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is SiteHealth MCP maintained?: The last commit was 191 days ago (2026-04-27). The latest release is v0.1.1.
What can I use instead of SiteHealth MCP?: Servers from other publishers that do the same job: SSH Manager MCP server and Domain Liveness MCP server.
How does SiteHealth MCP compare with other MCP servers?: safety score 82/100 (higher than 63% of 48,255 servers); tools 7 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 29% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

SSH Manager
SSH for AI agents: commands, files, backups and health, with approval, a vault and an audit trail
not reviewed
Established
A
Domain Liveness
Is this business's website still there? Checks apex and www, and DNS separately from HTTP.
not reviewed
Established
A