MCP.Market

Unity AI Bridge MCP server

by butterlatte-zhang·io.github.butterlatte-zhang/unity-ai-bridge·v1.0.0·20 stars

Remote-control Unity Editor from any AI IDE via file-based IPC. 62 tools, zero dependencies.

D43/100grade D
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
D43/100

full report

Adoption
New

20 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Unity AI Bridge yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Unity AI Bridge tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-09-28 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualityno auth information5/15
  • Maintenancelast push 187 days ago4/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 43/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Unity AI Bridge compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
43/100
higher than 8% of 48,273 servers
GitHub stars
20
more than 91% of 28,534 servers

Install Unity AI Bridge in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

The registry entry has no remote endpoint or installable package.

Unity AI Bridge: common questions

Is Unity AI Bridge MCP server safe?
Not recommended: it is graded D (43/100). Read the Unity AI Bridge safety report
Does Unity AI Bridge need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Unity AI Bridge maintained?
The last commit was 222 days ago (2026-03-25). The latest release is v1.0.0.
How does Unity AI Bridge compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 43/100 (higher than 8% of 48,273 servers); github stars 20 (more than 91% of 28,534 servers). Full comparison.