CrazySEO MCP server

CrazySEO

Find out whether ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity recommend your site — and why they don't.

An open-source GEO / AEO auditor and MCP server. No account. No card. Your keys.

Your customers have stopped googling. They ask an assistant "best CRM for small law firms?" and buy whatever it names. If it doesn't name you, you don't exist — and no analytics tool will tell you, because there is no click to measure.

This audits it directly: it asks the questions your buyers ask, records the answers word for word, and shows you which sources the models cite instead of you.

Why another one

Most tools in this space ask the model "what do you think of Acme?" — which tells you nothing, because naming the brand in the prompt guarantees it shows up in the answer.

This asks blind. Your brand never appears in the question, so the answer you get back is the answer a real buyer gets. That is the whole difference between a number you can act on and a number that flatters you.

Three more things a prompt wrapper can't do:

raw answer, so you can paste it into ChatGPT yourself and reproduce it.

• Verbatim receipts. Every result carries the exact prompt and the model's

never quietly drops an engine and calls the remaining average your score. If a site can't be reached, it refuses to score it rather than inventing a number.

• Honest coverage. If an engine fails or rate-limits, the report says so. It

• A real readiness audit. 11 checks against your actual site — not a prompt.

Quick start — no API keys needed

The readiness audit runs against any site with zero configuration and zero cost:

npx crazyseo readiness yourbrand.com

Nothing to install, no signup, no key. Or run it from source:

git clone https://github.com/d08m/crazyseo && cd crazyseo
npm install && npm run build
node dist/cli.js readiness yourbrand.com

AI-READINESS  stripe.com                                    82/100

  ✓ Served over HTTPS
  ✓ AI crawlers allowed
  ✓ Structured data (schema.org)
  ✓ llms.txt published (bonus)
  ✓ Title + meta description
  ✓ Readable without JavaScript
  ✓ Canonical URL set
  ✓ Social preview tags (Open Graph)
  ✗ Single, clear H1
      2 H1 tags — ambiguous which is the main topic
  ✗ Images have alt text
      27 of 31 images missing alt text
  ✓ Sitemap referenced
  ✓ No broken internal links

  → 2 issues to fix

(That's real output — stripe.com, unmodified.)

11 scored checks, all first-party fetches: HTTPS · AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended…) unblocked in robots.txt · schema.org markup · title + meta · readable without JavaScript · canonical · Open Graph · single-H1 structure · image alt-text coverage · sitemap referenced · broken internal links (sampled).

Plus llms.txt, shown but deliberately unscored: Google's own AI-optimization guidance says it has no effect in Google Search, so it can't fairly cost anyone points — but some agents do read it, so it's still worth seeing.

Exits non-zero when checks fail, so you can gate a deploy on it:

- run: npx crazyseo readiness ${{ env.SITE }}

Machine-readable output for pipelines:

npx crazyseo readiness yourbrand.com --json > report.json

The visibility audit — bring your own keys

To measure what the engines actually say, add whichever keys you have. Any one is enough; more engines means more coverage.

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.