MCP.Market

Batchwatch MCP server

by batchwatch·io.github.batchwatch/batchwatch-mcp·v0.1.1

Ask batchwatch whether to batch a job and get the real measured queue evidence, not a guess.

A86/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A86/100

full report

Adoption
New

0 stars44 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Batchwatch yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Batchwatch tools (6)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • conditions

    Current queue conditions for a model right now vs its recent norm — "is it me or them?".

  • coverage

    Which provider+model combinations batchwatch currently has data for, and how answerable each is

  • distribution

    The full measured wait distribution for a model + mode over a window. The raw evidence behind

  • estimate_batchtime

    How long is MY job likely to wait? Returns the batch-wait distribution (p50/p90) for the model,

  • should_i_batch

    The verdict: given a model and your own max_wait, does the batch queue currently honour it?

  • wait

    The public "is the queue moving now?" reading for a model (delayed without a key). Lighter than

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-29 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan2 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 59 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Overall 86/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Batchwatch compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
86/100
higher than 72% of 48,243 servers
Tools
6
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Downloads a week
44
more than 34% of 12,306 servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 6 read

Install Batchwatch in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

Runs npx -y batchwatch-mcp on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.

claude mcp add batchwatch-mcp -- npx -y batchwatch-mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Batchwatch repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Client libraries

batchwatch only works if people instrument their pipelines, and nobody writes raw HTTP calls to donate data. These are the libraries that make it two lines.

All nine expose the same surface, and a conformance check fails CI if any language falls behind — see The same surface, in all nine.

client/batchwatch.py in the repo root is the original single-file client and is left untouched. clients/python/ is the packaged version of it, plus spooling.

A note on TLS (Rust and C++). Every client except Rust and C++ gets TLS from its standard library and talks to https://batchwatch.dev directly. Rust's and C++'s standard libraries have no TLS, and both are written with zero external dependencies on purpose, so their transport is http:// only. Pointed at the default https:// URL they spool rather than deliver (the measurement is kept, not lost) until you point them at an http:// endpoint or a local TLS-terminating proxy. Their READMEs say so.

What every client does the same way

It fails open. A batchwatch outage must never stop a user's job. Every submission happens off the caller's thread with a short timeout, every error is swallowed and logged at debug level, and the only call you await — shouldbatch() — returns your* default when it cannot answer, never a guess. The default is "run it synchronously": being wrong that way costs money, being wrong the other way blows a deadline. Each package has a test that runs against a dead port and a hung socket.

Two lines to adopt. should_batch() before you submit, track() around the call.

It never sends content. No prompts, no completions, no file names. The body is built from one allowlist — provider, model, mode, endpoint, request count, token counts, timestamps, status — and everything else is dropped by a single function - _scrub in Python, Scrub in Go, clean in TypeScript, sanitize in PHP, Ruby and Java, strip in Rust and C++ - on the way out. Each package has a test that asserts this on what the server actually received, with a positive control so it cannot pass by sending nothing at all.

outputtokens defaults to null, never 0.** Output costs five to six times as much as input, so a saving computed on zero output is systematically too low — 3.4x too low in the case that led to this rule — and nothing in the response reveals it. Absence must stay absence all the way to the server. Explicitly passing 0 still sends 0: zero is a measurement.

It spools to disk. An undeliverable completed measurement is appended to a JSONL file and replayed later via POST /v1/calls/complete. Losing measurements when the network is bad means losing them exactly when they are most interesting.

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Batchwatch: common questions

Is Batchwatch MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (86/100). Read the Batchwatch safety report
How do I install Batchwatch?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Batchwatch need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Batchwatch maintained?
The last commit was 66 days ago (2026-08-31). The latest release is v0.1.1.
How does Batchwatch compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 86/100 (higher than 72% of 48,243 servers); tools 6 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.