MCP.Market

Cejel MCP server

by BargLabs·io.github.BargLabs/cejel·v0.6.8·2 stars

Offline deterministic engineering-trust certificates for repositories, with no telemetry.

A85/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A85/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
Growing

2 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Cejel yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Cejel tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How Cejel compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
85/100
higher than 70% of 48,255 servers
GitHub stars
2
more than 75% of 28,688 servers

Release history: 10 versions in the registry since 2026-09-17, latest 2026-10-22, typically one every 4 days.

Install Cejel in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add cejel -- docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/barglabs/cejel@sha256:12372dededed8fbdbe6d1061e6792e3d83e51d0640899dfbc1f8189f8ea67daa
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Cejel repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

cejel

Cejel ("SEH-jel") — a trust certificate for your codebase.

Free, offline, no-signup CLI that scores the engineering signals that tell you whether to trust a repo — tests, secrets, isolation, claim-vs-reality, CI/audit discipline — and prints a trust certificate + badge. Especially valuable when AI wrote a lot of the code: that's exactly when you can't eyeball trust. Built on a deterministic, no-LLM scoring core — the free path makes zero network calls and requires no account.

Claim boundary: Cejel scores engineering-trust signals; it does not claim to detect software defects or prove that code is safe. Defect and vulnerability scanners remain evidence producers that Cejel can aggregate into a trust certificate.

Cejel is not another point scanner competing with the one you already run — it's the open, portable, offline trust certificate that aggregates them. Pipe in SARIF-compatible output (MunaTrust, Snyk, Semgrep, CodeQL, Codex) plus OpenSSF Scorecard, and get one shareable certificate + badge over all of them. See "Aggregate your scanners" below.

Cejel is used on Barg Labs’ own code. The public board

labels publisher-owned snapshots separately from the ranked public repositories.

Rubric calibration policy

The public CLI default is witan-rubric-v17-2026-07-24, the last rubric to clear Cejel's preregistered 200-repository untouched holdout. Published calibration figures apply only to that exact rubric and frozen evaluation population. Later rubrics—including the current v18 through v23 prospective series—are available only to explicit evaluation harnesses. Prospective rubrics inherit none of v17's calibration figures; a bounded paired repair or corpus-delta result can validate its stated construction without transferring precision, recall, or false-positive-rate claims. Promoting a prospective rubric to the public default requires a fresh authenticated untouched holdout, every preregistered gate to pass, and a separately recorded promotion decision.

Measured recall (bounded)

Measured recall (bounded). Cejel publishes one cohort-level in-scope detection-recall

figure, for the prospective v22 rubric, in docs/calibration/v22-detection-recall/; no general

figure exists, and the three quantities called recall are set side by side on

cejel.dev/methodology. On a frozen,

preregistered, in-scope held-out fixture set of 30 named defects, the released public default

(v17, tree a857f0b3) cited 16/30, two-sided 95% Wilson interval [36.1%, 69.8%]; the

prospective v22 detector (commit 8a289ea, tree 10960a03) cited 24/30, two-sided 95%

Wilson interval [62.7%, 90.5%]. Same fixtures, same partition, same controls in both runs.

v22 is prospective and not the shipped default. Full preregistrations and results:

docs/experiments/in-scope-detection-recall-v3-result-2026-08-09.md and

docs/experiments/in-scope-detection-recall-v4-result-2026-08-11.md.

The defect-class census publishes the coverage-breadth boundary—which defect classes any shipped rule targets—and is explicitly not a recall claim.

Install

No account, no key, no signup.

Single-file binary. One file. No Node, no npm, no node_modules, nothing installed.

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Cejel: common questions

Is Cejel MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (85/100). Read the Cejel safety report
How do I install Cejel?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Cejel need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Cejel maintained?
The last commit was 33 days ago (2026-10-02). The latest release is v0.6.8.
How does Cejel compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 85/100 (higher than 70% of 48,255 servers); github stars 2 (more than 75% of 28,688 servers). Full comparison.