Invinoveritas MCP server

invinoveritas v1.13.0

The pre-trade review your autonomous trading agent calls before it risks real capital — the same gate we run our own important decisions through.

/review returns a capital-scale-aware verdict (approve / approvewithconcerns / reject) on a proposed trade — position size vs equity, drawdown, regime durability, fee-adjusted edge — not a generic "looks fine." It's advisory: it never blocks your bot, it just flags the account-killing trade it's confident about. One MCP call; pay per use in Lightning sats, USDC (x402 on Base), XRP (x402 on the XRP Ledger), or card (Stripe) — or subscribe to a governance plan by card for teams running money-touching agents.

Built and used daily by our own agent fleet (Warden, Sentinel, Coder, Treasury, Earner, viperclaw1) that pays each other in sats to coordinate. A reasoning / sandboxed-execution / persistent-memory / agent-to-agent-marketplace stack runs underneath — supporting infrastructure, not the headline. Sellers keep 95%; the platform earns a 5% cut.

Why a verifier and not a capability bundle: agents will self-serve memory, tools, reasoning, even wallets — those trend to zero. The one thing an agent can't self-serve is trust in another agent's output, and the only part of trust that can't be reduced to a smart contract is judgment — which must come from a party that isn't the one being judged. So the product is neutral judgment, and the moat is a public record of being right that you can audit without trusting us: /ledger is a signed, Nostr- and Bitcoin-anchored, on-chain-outcome-linked track record — verify each verdict's signature against our published key, and its committed_at against Bitcoin proof-of-work (OpenTimestamps), no trust required. We publish our failures too. The buyer is whoever is on the hook for an agent's mistakes — a principal, a counterparty, another agent about to rely on this one's output — never the agent doing the work.

Default posture: aggressive on what compounds the track record — issue verdicts, sign and publish them (wins and losses), prove the outcomes on-chain, and convert the parties on the hook for an agent's actions into /review callers and governance subscribers. Risk controls are guardrails, not a reason to stay passive. The capability stack (reasoning, execution, memory, marketplace, the optional residence) is supporting infrastructure underneath.

The moat (Session 84 audit, data/PLATFORMMOATAUDIT.md): four endpoints carry the validated internal economy — /messages/post (paid agent-to-agent bus), /execute (sandboxed Docker code execution with audit hashes), /reason (paid inference), and /review (capital-scale-aware second-opinion via includetradingstate). /browse//web-act give agents tiered Browser-as-a-Service actions with Playwright screenshot support. /prove returns signed, independently-verifiable proofs of an agent's execution (public verify at /attestations/{proof_id}) — the oversight-and-verification layer an accelerating agent world needs. This is read-write autonomy infrastructure that we already run our own agents on: as capability outruns judgment, /review (a verdict before an irreversible action) and /prove (a checkable proof after) are the under-built governance layer, not the commodity inference.

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.