MCP.Market

skimread MCP server

by avikchakraborty060-create·io.github.avikchakraborty060-create/skimread·v0.1.1

Lossless context guard for coding agents: command digests, file outlines, line-range reads.

A89/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A89/100

full report

Adoption
Growing

0 stars287 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed skimread yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

skimread tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan14 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 7 days ago15/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner6/10
Overall 89/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How skimread compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
89/100
higher than 80% of 48,255 servers
Downloads a week
287
more than 80% of 12,191 servers with a package

Install skimread in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add skimread -- uvx skimread
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the skimread repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

skimread — skim before you read

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.avikchakraborty060-create/skimread -->

A lossless context guard for AI coding agents. Zero dependencies, runs entirely on your machine, MIT licensed. Works with Claude Code out of the box, and with any other agent (Codex, Cursor, Aider, Copilot, your own) through a CLI and an MCP server.

What is it?

When you use an AI coding agent, you pay for every token it reads. Most of that money goes to two things the agent does not actually need:

  1. Reading big files whole. The agent wants one function and reads all 2,000 lines of the file to find it. Next session it does it again.
  2. Reading noisy command output. pytest -v prints 1,500 PASSED lines to tell you about 2 failures. npm install prints 40 deprecation warnings. cargo build lists every crate it compiled.

skimread sits between the agent and those two sources and hands the agent a skim first:

  • For files: an outline instead of the file. When the agent is about to read a large file, skimread gives it a map of the file (functions, classes, headings, keys, each with its line range) and says "read only the slice you need". The agent then reads 60 lines instead of 2,000.
  • For commands: a digest instead of the dump. Noisy commands run through skimread. The agent sees the errors, the failing tests, the stack frames in your code, and the summary line. The 1,500 PASSED lines are folded into one line that says so.

The key word is lossless. Nothing is thrown away. Every command's full output is kept on your disk, and every digest ends with a handle (skimread show 42, skimread show 42 120-180, skimread show 42 --grep TypeError). Every outline tells the agent exactly which line range to read next. The agent is never stuck and never has to re-run a build to see what it missed.

Why not one of the existing output compressors?

Tools that compress shell output already exist (RTK, token-saver, condense). They share two limits. They cannot touch the agent's own file-reading tool, which is the bigger token sink. And they are lossy: when the compressor drops the one line the agent needed, the agent re-runs the command, and an independent benchmark found that this can cost more than not compressing at all. skimread guards file reads too, and keeps everything retrievable.

What it is not

  • Not a cloud service. No network calls, no accounts, no telemetry. ~/.skimread is the whole state.
  • Not an LLM. Everything is deterministic parsing and folding, so it runs in milliseconds and costs nothing.
  • Not a summariser that guesses. It never rewrites a line; it only hides lines it can name and count, and tells you how to get them back.

Numbers

Measured on real tool output (fixtures in tests/fixtures, reproduce with python bench/bench.py). Token counts are estimates (chars / 3.6).

The last two rows are the point: when the output is already pure signal (a short build with two errors), skimread leaves it alone. Savings come from noise, never from hiding failures.

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

skimread: common questions

Is skimread MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (89/100). Read the skimread safety report
How do I install skimread?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does skimread need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is skimread maintained?
The last commit was 15 days ago (2026-10-20). The latest release is v0.1.1.
What can I use instead of skimread?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Desktop Commander MCP server and SSH Manager MCP server.
How does skimread compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 89/100 (higher than 80% of 48,255 servers); downloads a week 287 (more than 80% of 12,191 servers with a package). Full comparison.

Alternatives to skimread

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Desktop Commander
    MCP server for terminal commands, file operations, and process management
    C
  • SSH Manager
    SSH for AI agents: commands, files, backups and health, with approval, a vault and an audit trail
    A