MCP.Market

Quant Research MCP server

online · 96% uptime
by avasis.ai·ai.avasis/quant-research·v0.2.0·1 stars

Crypto backtest statistics: the server owns the trial count, so it cannot be understated.

B82/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B82/100

full report

Adoption
New

1 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Quant Research yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Quant Research tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-29 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 180ms (auth required)20/20
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualityauth enforced (bearer)9/15
  • Maintenancelast push 56 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityendpoint served from the registry-verified namespace domain8/10
Overall 82/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Quant Research compares

Against every graded Finance MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
82/100
higher than 73% of 1,759 Finance servers
Uptime
96%
of our recent checks; the typical remote Finance server answers 100%
Response time
253 ms
faster than 58% of 1,131 Finance servers
GitHub stars
1
more than 60% of 945 Finance servers

Install Quant Research in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http quant-research https://quant-mcp.avasis.ai/mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Quant Research repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

quant-integrity

Statistical tests for whether a backtest means anything.

**This library will not find you a profitable strategy. Its function is to reject

them.** Everything here exists to answer one question: given how many

configurations you tried before reporting this one, does the result survive?

pip install quant-integrity

The problem, in one picture

A moving-average crossover on BTC-USD hourly bars. After sweeping parameters, the best configuration returned an annualised Sharpe of 0.95 — and a Probabilistic Sharpe of 0.86, which reads as "probably beats zero".

That is where most backtests stop. Here is the same result next to the bar that 28 attempts actually sets:

The best of 28 tries is large even when every underlying edge is exactly zero. Against that bar the deflated Sharpe is 0.157. The observed result is not marginal; it is below half of what luck alone produces.

A high PSR with a low DSR is the signature of an overfit search, not a borderline edge.

What the search was actually selecting on

The cause was visible in the trials themselves. Sorting the 28 recorded runs by trade count against Sharpe:

Every configuration that traded less looked better, at ρ = −0.96. That is not a signal being discovered — it is cost drag being measured, plus a slow moving average approximating buy-and-hold in a rising market. The search was not finding an edge. It was finding the configuration that traded least.

And the interval was never tight to begin with

Reported alone, Sharpe = 0.95 implies a precision the data does not support.

Every number above is reproducible

git clone https://github.com/abhayjnayakk/quant-integrity
cd quant-integrity && pip install -e .
python docs/make_figures.py        # regenerates all three figures and prints the values

The trial count is taken from the recorded runs rather than typed in. An earlier version of this page hardcoded 29 while the file recorded 28, and quoted a deflated Sharpe from one and a minimum backtest length from the other.

The figures and this table are generated by the same script from examples/btcmaruns.npz (24 KB, the actual return series and per-trial results). No server and no account. There is also a longer walkthrough in examples/btcmapostmortem.ipynb.

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Grade history

  • 2026-10-29downgradeA → Bscore 82

Quant Research: common questions

Is Quant Research MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (82/100). Read the Quant Research safety report
How do I install Quant Research?
It runs remotely at quant-mcp.avasis.ai. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Quant Research need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for Authorization.
Is Quant Research maintained?
The last commit was 63 days ago (2026-09-03). The latest release is v0.2.0.
Is Quant Research up?
96% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
What can I use instead of Quant Research?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: EdgeDepth Research MCP server, Binance (security-first) + crypto analyst MCP server and Blockrun MCP server.
How does Quant Research compare with other Finance MCP servers?
safety score 82/100 (higher than 73% of 1,759 Finance servers); uptime 96% (of our recent checks; the typical remote Finance server answers 100%); response time 253 ms (faster than 58% of 1,131 Finance servers). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Quant Research

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • EdgeDepth Research
    Test crypto-perpetual claims using recorded counts, baselines, and replay.
    A
  • Binance (security-first) + crypto analyst
    Security-first Binance MCP. 26 tools, human-confirmed spot trades, offline quant research.
    B
  • Blockrun
    Web search, deep research, prediction markets & crypto data for AI agents. Pay per call via x402.
    B
  • AlgoVault — Crypto Quant Trade Calls
    The Brain Layer for AI Trading Agents — quant calls + cross-venue arb across perp venues via MCP.
    A
  • Shumi
    Crypto market intelligence: prices, funding rates, narratives, regime, and delta-neutral research.
    A