MCP.Market

SEO Performance MCP server

by AutomateLab-tech·io.github.AutomateLab-tech/seo-performance-mcp·v1.0.1·2 stars

Per-URL SEO verdicts from GSC, GA4, Matomo, Clarity, AI citations: refresh/expand/merge/kill.

B71/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B71/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
Growing

2 stars68 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed SEO Performance MCP yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

SEO Performance MCP tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How SEO Performance MCP compares

Against every graded SEO MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
71/100
higher than 37% of 769 SEO servers
GitHub stars
2
more than 75% of 400 SEO servers
Downloads a week
68
more than 48% of 164 SEO servers with a package

Release history: 2 versions in the registry since 2026-06-08, latest 2026-10-27, typically one every 141 days.

Install SEO Performance MCP in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

Runs npx -y @automatelab/seo-performance-mcp on your machine. Read the scan report first; the gateway never runs local packages.

claude mcp add seo-performance-mcp -- npx -y @automatelab/seo-performance-mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the SEO Performance MCP repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

seo-performance-mcp

Know which blog posts to refresh, expand, merge, or kill - without guessing.

A MCP server that turns your scattered SEO and analytics data into one clear verdict per URL. Plug it into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-aware client and ask: "Which three posts should I update this week?" - and get an answer backed by hard numbers.

What it does

seo-performance-mcp unifies post-publish signals from every channel you already pay for:

  • Google Search Console - clicks, impressions, CTR, position, top queries
  • Matomo or GA4 - visits, dwell time, bounce rate
  • Microsoft Clarity - scroll depth, rage clicks, dead clicks
  • AI citation tracking - which LLMs cite your URL today vs. last month
  • Sitemap / CMS - publish dates, tags, word counts (any platform via XML sitemap; optional Ghost integration for richer metadata)

It then runs a deterministic rule engine over those signals and emits a verdict per URL:

refresh / expand / merge / kill / double_down / hold

with reason codes, evidence, and a 0-1 confidence score. Reporting only - the server never mutates your posts.

Why it matters

Most content teams have analytics in five tabs and a gut feeling. That's how good posts rot quietly, mediocre posts get over-promoted, and the obvious "rewrite this one" is invisible until traffic has already cratered.

This MCP closes the loop:

  • One question, one URL in, one verdict out.
  • Same logic across the whole cohort, so the ranking is comparable.
  • All decisions traceable to numeric thresholds you can pin in src/verdict/rules.ts.
  • AI clients (Claude, Cursor, MCP hosts) can drive the entire content audit in plain English.

Who it's for

  • Content marketers running a blog of 50+ posts and tired of guessing what to refresh.
  • SEO consultants doing audits who want a portable, deterministic scoring layer instead of bespoke spreadsheets.
  • AI-first content teams wiring up rewrite agents - this MCP is the upstream signal layer.
  • Indie publishers on Ghost, WordPress, Hugo, Astro, Next, Webflow, or any CMS that exposes a sitemap.

What you get

After one cohort run you have:

  • A ranked table of every post with a verdict and confidence score.
  • A markdown brief per "refresh" URL: numbers + top queries + suggested actions an editor (or a writing agent) can act on immediately.
  • A list of "quick wins": queries sitting at positions 5-15 with below-expected CTR - the fastest title-rewrite wins on the property.
  • A historical AI-citation diff: which LLMs cited you and stopped.

Install

npx -y @automatelab/seo-performance-mcp

In a Claude, Claude Code, or Cursor MCP config:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "seo-performance": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@automatelab/seo-performance-mcp"],
      "env": {
        "POSTS_SITEMAP_URL": "https://example.com/sitemap.xml",
        "GSC_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_JSON": "<base64-encoded service-account JSON>",
        "GSC_SITE_URL": "sc-domain:example.com",
        "MATOMO_URL": "https://example.com/analytics",
        "MATOMO_TOKEN": "...",
        "MATOMO_SITE_ID": "1",
        "GA4_PROPERTY_ID": "123456789",
        "GA4_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_JSON": "<base64-encoded service-account JSON>",
        "CLARITY_PROJECT_ID": "...",
        "CLARITY_API_TOKEN": "...",
        "CITATION_INTELLIGENCE_URL": "https://citation.example.com"
      }
    }
  }
}

Every env var is optional. Adapters that lack their env config skip their slice of the snapshot; the server still boots. The verdict engine works on whatever slices are present.

Platform integration

Point it at any site, no CMS plugin required. The post-discovery layer resolves in priority order:

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

SEO Performance MCP: common questions

Is SEO Performance MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (71/100). Read the SEO Performance MCP safety report
How do I install SEO Performance MCP?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does SEO Performance MCP need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for GSC_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_JSON, MATOMO_TOKEN, GA4_SERVICE_ACCOUNT_JSON, CLARITY_API_TOKEN and 1 more.
Is SEO Performance MCP maintained?
The last commit was 147 days ago (2026-06-08). The latest release is v1.0.1.
What can I use instead of SEO Performance MCP?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: SEO Monster MCP server, Google Search Console MCP server and SEO Tools: Google Search Console MCP server.
How does SEO Performance MCP compare with other SEO MCP servers?
safety score 71/100 (higher than 37% of 769 SEO servers); github stars 2 (more than 75% of 400 SEO servers); downloads a week 68 (more than 48% of 164 SEO servers with a package). Full comparison.

Alternatives to SEO Performance MCP

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • SEO Monster
    Local-first SEO MCP: track AI citations, Search Console, GA4, PageSpeed, Cloudflare, IndexNow, CrUX.
    A
  • Google Search Console
    Google Search Console: SEO audits, performance queries, URL inspection, indexing checks.
    B
  • SEO Tools: Google Search Console
    Google Search Console: Search Analytics, URL Inspection, sitemaps (read-only, OAuth/service acct).
    B
  • SEO Skill
    Free Google Search Console MCP: your real GSC, Google Analytics and keyword data for AI agents.
    A
  • Google Ads + Meta Ads + SEO/GEO MCP
    Google Ads, Meta Ads, Google Analytics (GA4) & Search Console MCP server by Ryze AI
    A

More from AutomateLab-tech →