MCP.Market

Blast Scope MCP server

by Atharva-Jayappa·io.github.Atharva-Jayappa/blast-scope·v0.6.1

Contextual blast-radius scoring for shell commands an AI agent is about to run

A88/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A88/100

full report

Adoption
New

0 stars63 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Blast Scope yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Blast Scope tools (4)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • assess_command

    Assess the blast radius of a shell command.

  • index_project

    Build or refresh the dependency graph for a project.

  • list_snapshots

    List undo snapshots captured before risky commands, newest first.

  • restore_snapshot

    Undo a risky command by restoring a snapshot's files in place.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-23 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan34 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 46 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 88/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Blast Scope compares

Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
88/100
higher than 80% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
Tools
4
the typical AI and agents server has 6
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Downloads a week
63
more than 51% of 1,538 AI and agents servers with a package

What its tools let an agent do: 4 read

Install Blast Scope in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add blast-scope -- uvx blast-scope
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Blast Scope repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Blast Scope

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.Atharva-Jayappa/blast-scope -->

A consequence engine for shell commands. Blast Scope scores what a command would actually do — before an AI agent (or you) runs it. It doesn't pattern-match syntax into a blocklist; it figures out the command's real target, observes that target with a safe, read-only probe, and returns a structured risk score with evidence.

The whole point is contextual blast radius. The same command gets a completely different score depending on what it would actually hit:

COMMAND                            SEVERITY   WHY                                          ADVICE
─────────────────────────────────  ────────   ──────────────────────────────────────────  ───────
rm -rf ./logs                      LOW        0 importers · regenerable · outside src      proceed
rm -rf ./config                    CRITICAL   8 modules import it · high PageRank hub      block
git reset --hard   (clean tree)    LOW        nothing uncommitted to discard               proceed
git reset --hard   (4 dirty files) HIGH       would throw away 4 files of uncommitted work confirm
git push --force   (protected)     CRITICAL   would orphan commits on a protected branch   block
docker volume rm cache  (absent)   LOW        volume doesn't exist — nothing to remove     proceed
docker volume rm pgdata (in use)   CRITICAL   holds data · in use · no image to rebuild    block
pip uninstall flask     (uv.lock)  LOW        regenerable — exact version pinned in lock   proceed
DROP TABLE users        (42 rows)  CRITICAL   schema + 42 rows · irreversible              block
DELETE FROM logs        (in txn)   HIGH       no WHERE — but inside a txn, ROLLBACK-able    confirm

Two commands can be byte-identical and score four bands apart. That gap is the product.

Not a blocklist. Not a replacement for Shellfirm. Not a syscall monitor. It

scores structural consequence — advisory, never blocking — and for the rare

critical command it captures an undo snapshot first.

How it works

A command flows through a cheap funnel: almost everything is recognized as non-destructive in microseconds and exits silent. Only a flagged destructive candidate pays for a probe.

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Blast Scope: common questions

Is Blast Scope MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (88/100). Read the Blast Scope safety report
How do I install Blast Scope?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Blast Scope need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Blast Scope maintained?
The last commit was 88 days ago (2026-08-08). The latest release is v0.6.1.
What can I use instead of Blast Scope?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Commands MCP server, three.ws Autopilot MCP server and Shellward MCP server.
How does Blast Scope compare with other AI and agents MCP servers?
safety score 88/100 (higher than 80% of 4,460 AI and agents servers); tools 4 (the typical AI and agents server has 6); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Blast Scope

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Commands
    Model Context Protocol server to run commands (tool: `runProcess`)
    A
  • three.ws Autopilot
    Set autopilot scopes and a daily SOL spend cap, then propose, execute, and undo agent actions.
    B
  • Shellward
    AI agent security: 7 MCP tools for injection detection, PII scanning, command safety, DLP.
    A