Blast Scope MCP server
io.github.Atharva-Jayappa/blast-scope·v0.6.1Contextual blast-radius scoring for shell commands an AI agent is about to run
0 stars63 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Blast Scope yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Blast Scope tools (4)
write = sends, deletes, buys or postsRead from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.
assess_commandAssess the blast radius of a shell command.
index_projectBuild or refresh the dependency graph for a project.
list_snapshotsList undo snapshots captured before risky commands, newest first.
restore_snapshotUndo a risky command by restoring a snapshot's files in place.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-23 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
- Code scan34 source files scanned25/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 46 days ago12/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
How Blast Scope compares
Against every graded AI and agents MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 88/100
- higher than 80% of 4,460 AI and agents servers
- Tools
- 4
- the typical AI and agents server has 6
- Tools that change things
- 0%
- typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
- Downloads a week
- 63
- more than 51% of 1,538 AI and agents servers with a package
What its tools let an agent do: 4 read
Install Blast Scope in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add blast-scope -- uvx blast-scope
What the publisher says
From the Blast Scope repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
Blast Scope
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.Atharva-Jayappa/blast-scope -->
A consequence engine for shell commands. Blast Scope scores what a command would actually do — before an AI agent (or you) runs it. It doesn't pattern-match syntax into a blocklist; it figures out the command's real target, observes that target with a safe, read-only probe, and returns a structured risk score with evidence.
The whole point is contextual blast radius. The same command gets a completely different score depending on what it would actually hit:
COMMAND SEVERITY WHY ADVICE
───────────────────────────────── ──────── ────────────────────────────────────────── ───────
rm -rf ./logs LOW 0 importers · regenerable · outside src proceed
rm -rf ./config CRITICAL 8 modules import it · high PageRank hub block
git reset --hard (clean tree) LOW nothing uncommitted to discard proceed
git reset --hard (4 dirty files) HIGH would throw away 4 files of uncommitted work confirm
git push --force (protected) CRITICAL would orphan commits on a protected branch block
docker volume rm cache (absent) LOW volume doesn't exist — nothing to remove proceed
docker volume rm pgdata (in use) CRITICAL holds data · in use · no image to rebuild block
pip uninstall flask (uv.lock) LOW regenerable — exact version pinned in lock proceed
DROP TABLE users (42 rows) CRITICAL schema + 42 rows · irreversible block
DELETE FROM logs (in txn) HIGH no WHERE — but inside a txn, ROLLBACK-able confirmTwo commands can be byte-identical and score four bands apart. That gap is the product.
Not a blocklist. Not a replacement for Shellfirm. Not a syscall monitor. It
scores structural consequence — advisory, never blocking — and for the rare
critical command it captures an undo snapshot first.
How it works
A command flows through a cheap funnel: almost everything is recognized as non-destructive in microseconds and exits silent. Only a flagged destructive candidate pays for a probe.
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Blast Scope: common questions
- Is Blast Scope MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (88/100). Read the Blast Scope safety report
- How do I install Blast Scope?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does Blast Scope need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Blast Scope maintained?
- The last commit was 88 days ago (2026-08-08). The latest release is v0.6.1.
- What can I use instead of Blast Scope?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Commands MCP server, three.ws Autopilot MCP server and Shellward MCP server.
- How does Blast Scope compare with other AI and agents MCP servers?
- safety score 88/100 (higher than 80% of 4,460 AI and agents servers); tools 4 (the typical AI and agents server has 6); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.
Alternatives to Blast Scope
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- CommandsModel Context Protocol server to run commands (tool: `runProcess`)not reviewedEstablishedA
- three.ws AutopilotSet autopilot scopes and a daily SOL spend cap, then propose, execute, and undo agent actions.not reviewedEstablishedB
- ShellwardAI agent security: 7 MCP tools for injection detection, PII scanning, command safety, DLP.not reviewedEstablishedA