MCP.Market

Verdict QA MCP server

by ArtJack·io.github.ArtJack/verdict·v0.93.1·2 stars

Read-only MCP server over Verdict QA state: verdicts, findings, flaky quarantine, history.

A85/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A85/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
Growing

2 stars201 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Verdict QA yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Verdict QA tools

No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How Verdict QA compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
85/100
higher than 70% of 48,255 servers
GitHub stars
2
more than 75% of 28,688 servers
Downloads a week
201
more than 75% of 12,191 servers with a package

Release history: 13 versions in the registry since 2026-09-09, latest 2026-10-30, typically one every 4 days.

Install Verdict QA in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add verdict -- uvx verdict-qa-mcp
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Verdict QA repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Verdict

Your test suite is green. Verdict found a defect that had lived 4,595 days.

Verdict is a QA agent that does not fix, does not flatter, and does not forget. It measures before it judges — the harness runs your gates, hashes every line a finding cites, re-runs the guarding test at the old commit and the new one — and it keeps a memory: every run is a delta against the last, findings age, regressions rank first, and the tester's own misses are published beside its hits. The contract it runs under is immutable and hashed into every verdict; what it learns lives beside the contract, dated and auditable, and never edits it. The number above is real: FilePerms in a 4k★ Python library could not revoke a permission bit since 2014-02-07, and every one of its 625 tests was green the day Verdict filed it — the run, and the misses, are in the ledger.

/plugin marketplace add ArtJack/verdict     # Claude Code
/plugin install verdict@verdict
/verdict:run
npx skills add ArtJack/verdict              # every other coding agent

Most AI "QA agents" are a paragraph of enthusiasm with a checklist. They audit your repo from scratch every time, re-report the same 20 findings until you stop reading, call flaky tests "failures", call stale tests "failures", and end with "LGTM! 🎉".

Verdict is a Claude Code plugin built the way QA is actually practiced:

an age; every run reports NEW / STILL_OPEN / RESOLVED / REGRESSED — regressions ranked first, always.

  • It remembers. A state file carries the baseline. Every finding gets a stable ID and

STALEEXPECTATION (which needs a citation proving the change was intended), BRITTLETEST, ENVIRONMENT, or FLAKY (confirmed by re-runs, quarantined with an expiry). The classification most likely to excuse a regression carries the highest evidence bar.

  • A red test means something. Every failure is classified — REAL_DEFECT,

pass | pass with risks | blocked | fail — an open Blocker forces fail, blocked is a legitimate outcome, and a pass always names what was not tested.

  • A verdict you can defend. Every run ends in exactly one of

QA root, and a strict-mode Bash guard closes the shell's write channels — a tester that patches what it judges isn't independent. The guard is a heuristic, not a sandbox, and the README says so.

  • It never fixes your code. There is no Edit tool, a hook confines its writes to the

signed run history the model cannot forge, a track record the tester cannot edit — and a nightly audit of its own releases: 69 findings filed against itself so far, every one fixed in a tagged release with the defect pinned as a mutant the suite must kill.

  • It is tested, and it tests itself. A scored eval suite with the misses published, a

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Grade history

  • 2026-09-19restoreC → Ascore 85: subprocess with shell=True
  • 2026-09-19downgradeB → Cscore 66: Whole environment serialized (possible credential exfil); subprocess with shell=True

Verdict QA: common questions

Is Verdict QA MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (85/100). Read the Verdict QA safety report
How do I install Verdict QA?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Verdict QA need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Verdict QA maintained?
The last commit was 20 days ago (2026-10-15). The latest release is v0.93.1.
How does Verdict QA compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 85/100 (higher than 70% of 48,255 servers); github stars 2 (more than 75% of 28,688 servers); downloads a week 201 (more than 75% of 12,191 servers with a package). Full comparison.