MCP.Market

Safe Bite MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by AndrewVG23·io.github.AndrewVG23/safe-bite·v1.0.2
No reviews yet

Restaurant inspections for Chicago, NYC, Minneapolis, Milwaukee, Austin, and Denver.

C67/100grade C
Write a reviewRun it
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
C67/100

full report

Adoption
New

Little public usage data yet

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Safe Bite yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Safe Bite tools (5)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts
  • find_nearby_restaurantsFree

    Find restaurants near a point or address and return an MCP App card for each. Default radius is a quarter mile.

  • get_city_inspectionsFree

    Return one MCP App card of the worst restaurants in chicago, nyc, minneapolis, milwaukee, austin, or denver. Pass limit 500. One call is enough. Use this for a bad or nasty place in a city. Do not page, and do not quote inspector comments.

  • get_milwaukee_inspectionsFree

    Return one MCP App card of the worst Milwaukee restaurants. Pass limit 500 so the card ranks a wide recent window. One call is enough. Do not page, and do not quote inspector comments.

  • search_restaurantsFree

    Look up a restaurant by name and return an MCP App card for each match. Use this when someone asks to see a named place, such as Auntie Anne's in Milwaukee. The card is the answer. Do not rewrite inspection comments.

  • show_inspectionFree

    Answer a restaurant question with a card or a map. Use a restaurant name for a card, or a violation term plus a city for a map (for example pest inspections in Milwaukee). Hosts that support MCP Apps render the card or map inline. The text result still names the matches for hosts that only show text.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.10 · 2026-10-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 760ms20/20
  • Tool poisoning5 tool descriptions checked15/15
  • Auth qualityopen endpoint, read-only tools10/15
  • Maintenancerepository not readable: repo not found3/15
  • Maintainer identityno repository or website to verify2/10
Overall 67/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Safe Bite compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
67/100
higher than 25% of 48,255 servers
Tools
5
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Response time
156 ms
faster than 72% of 30,031 servers

What its tools let an agent do: 5 read

Install Safe Bite in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http safe-bite https://www.safebiter.com/mcp
Add to Cursor

Safe Bite: common questions

Is Safe Bite MCP server safe?
With care: it is graded C, so read the findings first (67/100). Read the Safe Bite safety report
How do I install Safe Bite?
It runs remotely at www.safebiter.com. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Safe Bite need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Safe Bite maintained?
The latest release is v1.0.2.
Is Safe Bite up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
How does Safe Bite compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 67/100 (higher than 25% of 48,255 servers); tools 5 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

More from AndrewVG23 →