Monitoring AIops MCP server
Governed SolarWinds Orion + PRTG + Zabbix ops: SWQL, alert rollup, health, 42 tools.
not scanned yet
0 stars191 downloads/wk
Reviews
Write oneNobody has reviewed Monitoring AIops yet.
If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.
Monitoring AIops tools
No tool declarations could be read from the package source. They show once the server is installed.
How Monitoring AIops compares
Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.
- Safety score
- 91/100
- higher than 85% of 48,255 servers
- Downloads a week
- 191
- more than 74% of 12,191 servers with a package
Release history: 3 versions in the registry since 2026-09-16, latest 2026-10-30, typically one every 28 days.
Install Monitoring AIops in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code
claude mcp add monitoring-aiops -- uvx monitoring-aiops
What the publisher says
From the Monitoring AIops repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.AIops-tools/monitoring-aiops -->
Monitoring AIops
Disclaimer: Community-maintained open-source project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by SolarWinds, Paessler, Zabbix, or any monitoring vendor. SolarWinds, Orion, SWQL, THWACK, PRTG, Paessler and Zabbix are trademarks of their respective owners. MIT licensed.
Governed AI-ops for network / infrastructure monitoring across three NOC platforms in one server — SolarWinds Orion (SWIS REST + SWQL, port 17774 with an automatic fallback to the legacy 17778, HTTP Basic auth), Paessler PRTG (web API, port 443/8080, API token), and Zabbix 6.x/7.x (JSON-RPC 2.0 at /apijsonrpc.php, API token) — with a built-in governance harness**: unified audit log, policy engine, token/runaway budget guard, undo-token recording, and risk-tier labelling on the audit trail. One config can span all NOCs; each target names its own platform.
What it does
Answers the questions a NOC operator actually repeats, and guards the writes that follow:
validated queries (nodesdown, flappinginterfaces, mutedreport, highcpunodes, volumesfull, unmanagedscheduled), plus a validated read-only SWQL passthrough** (SELECT-only) for everything else.
- Canned-SWQL library — the most-asked THWACK questions shipped as named,
storm into a single counted entry instead of a wall of near-identical alerts, across SolarWinds, PRTG, and Zabbix (problems, with the 0-5 severity scale mapped to canonical levels).
- Active-alert dedup / rollup — collapses an interface-flap or node-down
three NOCs; no incumbent hobby MCP does.
- Triple SolarWinds + PRTG + Zabbix coverage — one MCP server spans all
maintenance.create with a replayable delete-undo), unmanage/remanage, node removal, and PRTG sensor pause/resume — each audited, risk-tiered, and the destructive ones gated with dry-run + double-confirm. Suppression and maintenance writes are time-boxed (they require an end time / duration).
- Governed writes — mute/unmute, maintenance windows (incl. Zabbix
What this tool does, and does not, decide
It delivers NOC operations — reads and writes — accurately and efficiently, and records every one of them. It does not decide whether a write is allowed to happen. That is the agent's judgement, or the permission of the account you connect it with: give it a SolarWinds/PRTG/Zabbix account with read-only monitoring scope and the writes fail at the server — the place that actually owns the permission.
So there is no read-only switch, no policy file, no approval gate to configure. The one thing the tool guarantees is that nothing is silent: every call, over MCP and over the CLI alike, lands an audit row in ~/.monitoring-aiops/audit.db, and destructive writes still capture their before-state and record an inverse where one exists.
Each tool declares a risk_level, kept in agreement with its [READ]/[WRITE]
documentation tag by a test, and carried into the audit row as a descriptive
tier — so a reviewer can see at a glance that a row was a high-risk node
removal. It is a label, not a gate.
Running a smaller / local model? See agent-guardrails.md — it lists the guardrails this tool now enforces for you (so you don't spend prompt budget restating them) and gives a ready-made system prompt for what's left.
Capability matrix (42 MCP tools)
Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.
Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.
Monitoring AIops: common questions
- Is Monitoring AIops MCP server safe?
- Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (91/100). Read the Monitoring AIops safety report
- How do I install Monitoring AIops?
- It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
- Does Monitoring AIops need an API key?
- Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
- Is Monitoring AIops maintained?
- The last commit was 48 days ago (2026-09-16). The latest release is v0.13.0.
- What can I use instead of Monitoring AIops?
- Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Netdata MCP server.
- How does Monitoring AIops compare with other MCP servers?
- safety score 91/100 (higher than 85% of 48,255 servers); downloads a week 191 (more than 74% of 12,191 servers with a package). Full comparison.
Alternatives to Monitoring AIops
Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.
- NetdataReal-time infrastructure monitoring with metrics, logs, alerts, and ML-based anomaly detection.not reviewedWidely usedA