MCP.Market

Aicommander MCP server

online · 100% uptime
by aicommander.dev·dev.aicommander/mcp·v1.6.5

Remote shell and detached long-running jobs on your own machines — no SSH, open ports or VPN.

B84/100grade B
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
B84/100

not scanned yet

Adoption
Growing

989 downloads/wk

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Aicommander yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Aicommander tools

Tool list not cached yet. `describe` through the gateway fetches it live.

Not scanned yet. New listings are scanned within a day or two of arriving.

How Aicommander compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
84/100
higher than 68% of 48,243 servers
Uptime
100%
of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%
Response time
206 ms
faster than 66% of 30,027 servers
Downloads a week
989
more than 95% of 12,306 servers with a package

Release history: 6 versions in the registry since 2026-09-05, latest 2026-11-04, typically one every 12 days.

Install Aicommander in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add --transport http mcp https://aicommander.dev/mcp
Add to Cursor

Aicommander: common questions

Is Aicommander MCP server safe?
Mostly: it is graded B (84/100). Read the Aicommander safety report
How do I install Aicommander?
It runs remotely at aicommander.dev. Add it to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop with the snippets above, or call it through the mcp.market gateway without installing anything.
Does Aicommander need an API key?
Yes. The registry entry asks for AICOMMANDER_TOKEN.
Is Aicommander maintained?
The latest release is v1.6.5.
Is Aicommander up?
100% of our last 28 checks got an answer. We check remote servers about four times a day.
How does Aicommander compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 84/100 (higher than 68% of 48,243 servers); uptime 100% (of our recent checks; the typical remote server answers 100%); response time 206 ms (faster than 66% of 30,027 servers). Full comparison.