MCP.Market

Forgejudge MCP server

by ahmedEid1·io.github.ahmedEid1/forgejudge·v0.1.1

Open eval leaderboard + CI gate for autonomous coding agents (solve, score, trace).

A88/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A88/100

full report

Adoption
New

0 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Forgejudge yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Forgejudge tools (4, 2 write)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • _leaderboard_impl
  • get_leaderboard

    Return the current ForgeJudge leaderboard (one row per model).

  • get_runwrite action

    Return a single run record (score, patch, Langfuse trace URL) by id.

  • solve_issuewrite action

    Run the ForgeJudge agent on a golden task and grade its patch.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan57 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 36 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Overall 88/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Forgejudge compares

Against every graded Developer tools MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
88/100
higher than 75% of 1,119 Developer tools servers
Tools
4
the typical Developer tools server has 7
Tools that change things
50%
typical: 5%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break

What its tools let an agent do: 2 read · 2 change

Install Forgejudge in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add forgejudge -- uvx forgejudge
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Forgejudge repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

ForgeJudge

An open, always-on leaderboard and CI gate for autonomous coding agents — every patch runs in a sandbox, every run has a public trace, every regression fails the build.

▶ Live leaderboard: forgejudge.ahmedhobeishy.tech · playground · methodology · model swap · MCP registry

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.ahmedEid1/forgejudge --> <!-- ^ ownership proof for the MCP registry (validated against this PyPI long-description). -->

Current numbers (hidden-test = the agent never sees the failing test; $0 free tier; same harness, swap the model; 18 tasks × 3 seeds = 54 runs/model, 162 total):

| Model | pass@1 | pass@3 |

|---|---|---|

| gpt-oss-120b | 90.7% | 100% |

| llama-3.3-70b | 88.9% | 94.4% |

| llama-3.1-8b | 48.1% | 66.7% |

The score rises with the better model while the harness stays fixed (model-swap proof), and pass@3 > pass@1 shows real run-to-run variance — which is exactly why the CI gate is multi-seed. Every run deep-links its Langfuse trace.

ForgeJudge is the only open-source autonomous software-engineering agent that proves its quality in public on every commit: a hand-rolled single-agent solver, a deterministic execution-as-judge harness, an always-on leaderboard with per-run traces, and a CI gate that blocks regressions — all on a $0 / self-hostable stack against a contamination-resistant, intrinsically-verifiable golden set.

The engineered harness, observability, and gate are the deliverable — not a high resolution rate. A $0 free-model agent will score modestly by design. We prove value with a model-swap comparison: the score rises with a better model while the harness stays fixed.

How it works

flowchart TD
    G["Golden set · Git-canonical<br/>18 intrinsically-verifiable, mutation-hardened<br/>make-CI-green tasks"]

    subgraph SOLVER["Single-agent solver"]
        direction LR
        L["localize<br/>(BM25)"] --> R["repair<br/>(LLM router · critic · syntax edit-gate)"] --> V["validate<br/>(run tests)"]
    end

    G --> SOLVER
    SOLVER --> PATCH["unified diff"]
    SOLVER -. "every step traced" .-> TRACE["OTel → Langfuse<br/>per-run public trace"]

    PATCH --> H["Deterministic harness, in a sandbox<br/>apply test_patch + candidate patch · run F2P / P2P<br/><b>RESOLVED iff</b> every FAIL_TO_PASS passes AND every PASS_TO_PASS stays green<br/>swebench-equivalent · stricter on skips · cheat-resistant"]

    H --> STORE["Run store<br/>Neon + pgvector"]
    STORE --> LB["Leaderboard<br/>pass@1 / pass@3 · cost · tokens · trace link"]
    H --> GATE["Multi-seed CI gate<br/>a PR that lowers the resolution rate fails the build"]

    style G stroke:#3fb950,stroke-width:2px
    style H stroke:#4cc2ff,stroke-width:2px
    style GATE stroke:#f0883e,stroke-width:2px

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Forgejudge: common questions

Is Forgejudge MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (88/100). Read the Forgejudge safety report
How do I install Forgejudge?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Forgejudge need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Forgejudge maintained?
The last commit was 74 days ago (2026-08-22). The latest release is v0.1.1.
What can I use instead of Forgejudge?
Servers from other publishers that do the same job: Repowise MCP server, uploads.sh MCP server and Teamcity MCP server.
How does Forgejudge compare with other Developer tools MCP servers?
safety score 88/100 (higher than 75% of 1,119 Developer tools servers); tools 4 (the typical Developer tools server has 7); tools that change things 50% (typical: 5%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.

Alternatives to Forgejudge

Same job from other publishers: the closest match first, then the best rated.

  • Repowise
    Codebase intelligence for AI coding agents — graph, git history, docs, decisions, code health.
    B
  • uploads.sh
    Host files from coding agents; stage on a branch and attach to GitHub PRs.
    A
  • Teamcity
    MCP server exposing JetBrains TeamCity CI/CD workflows to AI coding assistants
    B
  • Foremerge
    Coordinate parallel coding agents, above Git
    A
  • RepoPilot
    Local, deterministic review of Git changes: weakened tests and CI gates, risky flows, blast radius.
    A