MCP.Market

Actenon Kernel MCP server

by Actenon·io.github.Actenon/kernel·v1.2.2·2 stars

Verify consequential AI actions before they execute.

A86/100grade A
What users say
No reviews yet
Be the first
Safety scan
A86/100

full report

Adoption
New

2 stars

Reviews

Write one

Nobody has reviewed Actenon Kernel yet.

If you have run it, two minutes of your experience saves the next person an afternoon.

Actenon Kernel tools (4)

write = sends, deletes, buys or posts

Read from the package source without running it. The installed server may list more.

  • actenon_demo_grant
  • actenon_gate
  • actenon_receipt
  • actenon_verify

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-24 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

no findings
  • Code scan198 source files scanned25/25
  • –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
  • Maintenancelast push 60 days ago12/15
  • Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Overall 86/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

How Actenon Kernel compares

Against every graded MCP server, from our own scans and uptime checks. Updated after each scan run.

Safety score
86/100
higher than 72% of 48,255 servers
Tools
4
the typical server has 7
Tools that change things
0%
typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break
GitHub stars
2
more than 75% of 28,688 servers

What its tools let an agent do: 4 read

Install Actenon Kernel in Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code

claude mcp add kernel -- uvx actenon-kernel
Add to Cursor

What the publisher says

From the Actenon Kernel repository's README, as published. We do not edit it. Read it on GitHub

Actenon Kernel

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.Actenon/kernel -->

The open verifier for proof-bound consequential execution. Defines what a valid proof is. Verifies proofs at the execution edge; issues no grants; runs no policy decisions.

<!-- PYTHON-BADGE:START --> <!-- PYTHON-BADGE:END -->

Every claim above is machine-verified

The claims: machine-verified badge links to a CI gate (verify-claims.yml) that fails on every PR, push to main, and once a day if any factual claim this README makes about the kernel stops being true:

runs in the gate, not just behind a badge link.

  • Zero network calls during verification — tests/test_neutrality.py

plus a source scan proving the kernel never imports Cloud or Permit, plus scripts/assertdepdirection.py (runtime deps are exactly actenon-protocol).

  • Runs without Permit, Cloud, or Scan — tests/test_independence.py,

what actenon-kernel conformance run actually executes; the vector files themselves are hash-locked by scripts/verifyconformancemanifest.py.

  • The conformance count — "51 conformance vectors" is compared against

against the live registry; the Python badge is generated, not hand-edited.

  • Install commands — every pip install in this README is resolved

never hand-edited.

  • The ecosystem table — rendered from the protocol's ecosystem.yaml,

The Invariants workflow additionally proves on every PR that a clean, no-extras install verifies the full conformance surface — 33/33 tests, zero skips — including Ed25519.

If a claim drifts, the badge goes red before a human notices.

The Actenon ecosystem

Shortened. The full README is on GitHub.

Nothing above is checked by us. What we check is on the safety report.

Actenon Kernel: common questions

Is Actenon Kernel MCP server safe?
Yes, by our scan: it is graded A (86/100). Read the Actenon Kernel safety report
How do I install Actenon Kernel?
It runs on your machine. Copy the Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Claude Desktop config from the install section.
Does Actenon Kernel need an API key?
Not as far as the registry entry and our scan can tell: no credentials are declared or required.
Is Actenon Kernel maintained?
The last commit was 100 days ago (2026-07-26). The latest release is v1.2.2.
How does Actenon Kernel compare with other MCP servers?
safety score 86/100 (higher than 72% of 48,255 servers); tools 4 (the typical server has 7); tools that change things 0% (typical: 0%. Fewer write tools means less an agent can break). Full comparison.